Intel has paths around Trump's China
tariffs, analysts say
Send a link to a friend
[June 19, 2018]
By Stephen Nellis
(Reuters) - Intel Corp, the world's biggest
chipmaker by revenue and a prominent U.S. manufacturer, could avoid the
most severe effects of a new list of Chinese tariffs proposed by U.S.
President Donald Trump by shifting its production among its facilities,
analysts said Monday.
On Friday, Trump said he planned to push ahead with tariffs on $50
billion worth of Chinese imports. While chips were largely spared from
the initial list of targeted goods released in April, U.S. trade
officials on Friday released a second tariff list of 284 products worth
$16 billion that includes the processor and memory chips at the heart of
Intel's business.
Those tariffs will not go into effect until after a public comment
period, and there is a chance that chips could be cut from it before it
is made final, analysts said. But Intel shares dropped 3.4 percent to
$53.22 on Monday on news of a stock downgrade and investor concerns over
tariffs. Late Monday, Trump also announced he might pursue $200 billion
more in tariffs on Chinese goods, though it was unclear whether the list
would include more chips or computing products that might impact Intel.
Intel could shift its production strategies to avoid much of the blow.
Intel produces raw chips at six so-called wafer fabs, with three in the
United States, one in Ireland, one in Israel and one in China. From
there, chips go to so-called assembly and test facilities.
After that, they are sold to Intel's customers, large computer brands or
contract manufacturers who work on their behalf. Most of those entities
are legally based in China because that is where most electronics are
built, and that explains why Intel booked $14.8 billion in China revenue
in 2017.
But it is Intel's $12.5 billion revenue from the United States that is
at risk. If Intel makes a chip at its U.S. plants in Oregon, Arizona or
New Mexico, then sends it to China for low-level assembly work and then
brings it back so it can be put into a device manufactured in the United
States, the chip would get hit by the tariff.
But Intel also has assembly and test centers in Costa Rica, Malaysia and
Vietnam. Chips from non-Chinese wafer fabs sold to American companies
that pass through those facilities likely would not be hit.
[to top of second column]
|
The Intel logo is shown at E3, the world's largest video game
industry convention in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 12, 2018.
REUTERS/Mike Blake
"My sense is they can probably skip most of the tariffs," said Dan
Hutcheson, CEO of VLSI Research Inc.
Intel does have a factory in Dalian, China where it makes flash
memory chips. The kind of flash memory chips Intel makes are not
targeted by the tariff list. But the risks of a broader escalation
of a trade war could hurt Intel’s efforts to expand into new areas.
"Trade wars in general are going to be bad for the global economy,
and semiconductors tend to be global," said Bernstein analyst Stacy
Rasgon.
The assembly and test work that many chipmakers carry out in China
makes up only about 10 percent of the value of a chip, with the
design and manufacturing making up the bulk of a chip's value. Jimmy
Goodrich, vice president of global policy for the Semiconductor
Industry Association, said chipmakers could be forced to pay tariffs
on their own products simply for doing a small portion of the work
in China.
"We should be talking about a policy frame work that supports, not
slows down, an industry that, unlike many others, still manufactures
here in the U.S.," Goodrich said.
(This version of the story has been refiled since its earlier
version,incorrectly stated that Intel’s memory chips made in China
would be subject to tariffs. The memory chips listed on the proposed
tariffs are a different kind to the ones Intel makes.)
(Reporting by Stephen Nellis; Editing by Greg Mitchell and Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|