Judge bars separation of immigrants from
children, orders families reunited
Send a link to a friend
[June 27, 2018]
(Reuters) - A federal judge ruled on
Tuesday that U.S. immigration agents could no longer separate immigrant
parents and children caught crossing the border from Mexico illegally,
and must reunite those families that had been split up in custody.
United States District Court Judge Dana Sabraw granted the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed
over the family separations.
More than 2,300 migrant children were separated from their parents after
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration began a "zero tolerance"
policy in early May, seeking to prosecute all adults who crossed the
border illegally, including those traveling with children.
"The facts set forth before the court portray reactive governance
responses to address a chaotic circumstance of the government's own
making," Sabraw wrote. "They belie measured and ordered governance,
which is central to the concept of due process enshrined in our
Constitution."
Sabraw ordered the government to reunite parents with their children
younger than 5 years old within 14 days of the order, and children 5
years old and older within 30 days of the order.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4954d/4954dd3f72de7188dad66544ac6ed0ba3f3ce1e6" alt=""
Sabraw's ruling could force the administration to rapidly address
confusion left by Trump's order, and government agencies to scramble to
reunite families. The administration can appeal.
The ACLU had sued on behalf of a mother and her then 6-year-old
daughter, who were separated after arriving last November in the United
States to seek asylum and escape religious persecution in Democratic
Republic of Congo.
While they were reunited in March, the ACLU is pursuing class-action
claims on behalf of other immigrants.
Trump issued an executive order to end the family separations on June
20, but the government has yet to reunite about 2,000 children with
their parents.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cbb9/6cbb9c0a534c42801e6e4cb6a1fd6291c1f5c201" alt=""
Honduran children seeking asylum wait on the Mexican side of the
Brownsville & Matamoros International Bridge after their family was
denied entry by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers near
Brownsville, Texas, U.S., June 26, 2018. Picture taken June 26,
2018. REUTERS/Loren Elliott
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46300/463009ce41930950fafa0c5026a0d709ad58b2bd" alt=""
The ACLU said on Monday Trump's order contained "loopholes", and
proposed requiring that families be reunited within 30 days, unless
the parents were unfit or were housed in adult-only criminal
facilities.
Before the preliminary injunction ruling, the U.S. government urged
Sabraw not to require that it stop separating and quickly reunite
migrant families after they illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border,
saying Trump's executive order last week "largely" addressed those
goals.
Sabraw, who was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush,
had on June 6 rejected the government's bid to dismiss the case,
saying forced separations could "shock the conscience" and amount to
a violation of constitutional due process.
The case is Ms. L et al v U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, No.
18-00428.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, Dan Whitcomb in Los
Angeles and Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Himani Sarkar
and Darren Schuettler)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d507/2d5073251b804f2c0b1c0ca3cbc4d93f2503e540" alt="" |