Minnesota regulator approves rebuild of
Enbridge pipeline
Send a link to a friend
[June 29, 2018]
By Rod Nickel
ST. PAUL, Minn. (Reuters) - A Minnesota
regulator on Thursday approved a certificate of need for Enbridge Inc to
rebuild its Line 3 oil pipeline, angering environmentalists but offering
hope to Western Canadian oil producers that have struggled to move crude
oil to refiners.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's decision clears the final
major hurdle, pending possible appeals, in Enbridge's three-year effort
to rebuild its aging, corroded 1,031-mile (1,660-km) pipeline that runs
from Alberta in western Canada to Wisconsin.
Shares of Calgary, Alberta-based Enbridge closed up 3.7 percent in
Toronto.
The commission also approved a route that closely follows Enbridge's
preference and will take Line 3 over a new corridor for part of its
path.
The certificate of need has conditions, including that Enbridge make a
financial guarantee to clean up any environmental damage and that it
remove at landowners' request pipeline that is no longer in use.
Pipeline bottlenecks have steepened a price discount for Western
Canadian heavy crude this year. Refiners in Minnesota and surrounding
states say Line 3 is necessary to increase crude supplies.
Shouts from Native Americans and environmental activists interrupted the
meeting.
"Shame on you, you cowards!" one woman shouted before breaking into
tears.
Environmental groups and some indigenous communities oppose the project
over concerns about spills and impact on tribal wild rice harvesting
areas.
"What they have done to us today is egregious," said Winona LaDuke,
executive director of Honor the Earth activist group. "They have gotten
their Standing Rock. We will do everything that is needed to stop this
pipeline."
The Standing Rock tribe led opposition in 2016 to the Dakota Access
Pipeline in North Dakota, one of the most bitterly contested energy
projects in years. It was eventually built.
The coalition of Line 3 opponents is likely to formally request that the
commission reconsider its approval, said Joe Plumer, lawyer for White
Earth Nation.
Business and labor groups say the $7 billion project, of which $2.5
billion would be spent in Minnesota, will create jobs and tax revenue.
"It's going to give everybody a real boost," said Bob Schoneberger, who
runs a piping contractor business in Duluth, Minnesota.
Enbridge Chief Executive Al Monaco said in a statement that he was
pleased with the commission's decisions, and said the project's cost was
materially unchanged. He said he continues to expect the rebuilt
pipeline to begin service in the second half of 2019.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e591b/e591bfd92399f376848095a65b9c282329b4910e" alt=""
An activist opposing the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline, dangles from
a steel structure erected outside the Minnesota Public Utilities
Commission office in St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S., June 28, 2018.
REUTERS/Rod Nickel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5a1/af5a1bf31f0436dde13ddd573a9352abb614a2c0" alt=""
Line 3, which began service in 1968, operates at half its capacity.
Its replacement would allow it to return to approved capacity of
760,000 barrels per day.
"That pipeline is an accident waiting to happen," said Commissioner
Dan Lipschultz. "It feels like a gun to our head that compels us to
approve a new line ... but the gun is real and it’s loaded."
Several commissioners voiced doubts that demand for crude oil and
refined products such as gasoline would grow enough to warrant the
pipeline. But Enbridge's rationing of demand from oil shippers for
space on Line 3 was more convincing of a need to rebuild, said
Chairwoman Nancy Lange.
The rebuilt Line 3 will follow the existing pipeline path partway
through Minnesota, before veering south to bypass Leech Lake reserve
and avoid a need to shut down the pipeline for up to one year during
construction.
The path of a short stretch near Fond du Lac reserve will be
determined by negotiations between the tribe and Enbridge.
Tribes in the area had said Enbridge's preferred route was the worst
of numerous options. Fond du Lac lawyer Seth Bichler told the
commission that the tribes preferred a longer route to the south
that would avoid more sensitive land.
Recognized parties, including Enbridge, environmental and indigenous
groups, have 20 days from the time a written order is issued -
likely in a couple of weeks - to ask the commission to reconsider.
If such an application is denied, a party can then appeal to
Minnesota's appeals court.
Line 3 also requires 29 additional permits from local, state and
federal levels, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton said in a statement.
"Approvals are by no means assured," he said.
(Reporting by Rod Nickel in St. Paul, Minnesota; Editing by Diane
Craft and Leslie Adler)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |