Trump administration backs states' bid to
collect online sales taxes
Send a link to a friend
[March 06, 2018]
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump
administration on Monday said states should be able to require online
retailers to collect sales taxes, backing an appeal by South Dakota at
the U.S. Supreme Court that could mean billions of dollars in revenue
for state coffers.
South Dakota is asking the justices to overturn a 1992 Supreme Court
ruling that companies with no physical presence in a state are not
required to collect a state sales tax on purchases. A lower court
decision favored Internet retailers Wayfair Inc, Overstock.com Inc and
Newegg Inc in the dispute.
In a legal brief filed on Monday with the Supreme Court, the U.S.
Department of Justice said the 1992 ruling may have to be overruled
because it no longer fits with the rise of modern day e-commerce in
which online retailers can replicate the shopping experience of a
physical store even where it has no physical property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ef7/57ef71ad0a4fd4f6b8b31f57e45334c8092a7156" alt=""
"A physical-presence requirement ... bears no logical relationship to
current economic conditions, and imposes intolerable burdens on the
states’ ability to collect tax revenue they are lawfully owed,"
Solicitor General Noel Francisco said in the brief.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated in a November report
that states and municipalities could gain between $8 billion and $13
billion in annual revenue if they could require online retailers to
collect sales tax. Forty-five of the 50 states have a statewide sales
tax.
Some online retailers, including leading player Amazon.com Inc, already
collect state sales tax but others do not.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4296/d4296cf295316334ca00616a05d7465bcc1e0505" alt=""
President Donald Trump waves upon his arrival in West Palm Beach,
Florida, U.S., March 2, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea914/ea914921cb90750ccf26934d86ff22b9d3391188" alt=""
Traditional retail industry groups argue that e-commerce businesses
have an unfair advantage over brick-and-mortar competitors by being
able to avoid collecting sales tax. Various trade groups and 35
states had urged the high court to take up South Dakota's appeal.
South Dakota enacted a law requiring out-of-state retailers to
collect sales tax in 2016 and filed suit against four retailers soon
after the law was enacted: Wayfair, Overstock.com, Newegg Inc and
Systemax Inc. Systemax agreed to collect the tax, while the other
companies contested the state law.
In a September 2017 ruling, the South Dakota Supreme Court, citing
the 1992 precedent, ruled against the state.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case in April and make
a decision by the end of June, when its current term ends.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Additional reporting by Lawrence Hurley;
Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e7d7/5e7d71a6b4d832bc47421331d78d206c410a3118" alt="" |