About 10 percent of pregnant women have chronic high blood pressure,
gestational high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia - a complication of
pregnancy that includes elevated blood pressure - and must keep tabs
on their blood pressure throughout pregnancy.
"I saw just how much time and effort women diagnosed with high blood
pressure in pregnancy have to spend attending the hospital for
monitoring," said senior study author Dr. Asma Khalil, an
obstetrician at St. George's Hospital at the University of London.
They often have to come to the hospital two or three times a week,
spending a couple of hours each time, having their blood pressure
and urine monitored, Khalil added.
"I saw how they had to take time off work, arrange childcare, and
spend time and money coming to the hospital. I also saw how busy
this made the staff at the hospital day unit, and the cost to the
health services," she told Reuters Health in an email.
On top of all of that, just coming to the hospital often stressed
women so much that it made their blood pressure higher than it had
been at home, Khalil said.
To see if women could monitor themselves at home effectively, and
without any added risks to themselves or the pregnancy, the
researchers enrolled pregnant patients of the hospital who had been
diagnosed with high blood pressure but were otherwise healthy.
A total of 108 women were taught how to measure and track their
blood pressure at home using the WatchBP Home monitor. Twenty-nine
of these women also opted to use a smartphone app to record their
measurements while the rest simply kept written notes.
In addition, women assigned to home monitoring were given written
instructions regarding when to go to the hospital based on their
blood pressure readings or potential symptoms of pre-eclampsia.
Another 58 women, similar to those in the home-monitoring group,
were used as a comparison group drawn from past patients of the
hospital who had received normal care.
All the women were followed for five to nine weeks during pregnancy,
and the study team analyzed post-delivery records to assess
pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, cesarean sections,
admission to neonatal unit and others. The mothers’ incidence of
hypertension-related complications including kidney, liver and heart
problems was also assessed.
[to top of second column] |
"There was no difference in the incidence of adverse maternal, fetal
or neonatal outcome between women who had home blood pressure
monitoring and those who had the traditional blood pressure
monitoring," Khalil said.
Women who self-monitored averaged 0.8 visits to the clinic per week,
compared to the traditional-care group’s average of 1.6 visits per
week, according to the results in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and
Gynecology.
Home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy reduces hospital blood
pressure visits by 50 percent without increasing the risk of
complications, so it is likely to be safe and cost saving, Khalil
said.
"The app also sends your readings to a computer at the hospital
which is monitored by the midwives or doctors there, so they can
keep an eye on you too. This saves you a lot of time, money and
effort, and puts you in control of your own health," she said.
The study provides early evidence that self-monitoring might improve
the detection and management of high blood pressure in pregnant
women but there is not currently enough evidence for this to be
recommended as standard practice, said Katherine Tucker and Richard
McManus, researchers at the University of Oxford who were not
involved in the study.
"This study also shows the potential for self-monitoring to reduce
the cost of care through better organized antenatal services, but
further research is still needed in this area," they told Reuters
Health in an email.
Self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy is common in some
countries, such as Canada, but researchers still don't understand
how effective this is or the best way to use home readings for
improved care, they added.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2FKC9ik Ultrasound in Obstetrics and
Gynecology, online February 22, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |