Alex Pabon had argued the main banking witness for Britain's
Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Saul Haydon Rowe, gave evidence that
was incomplete or inaccurate and outside his expertise and could
have damaged the trader's credibility.
The Court of Appeal said in its judgment it had concluded that
Pabon's conviction was safe. "We dismiss the appeal".
Barclays declined to comment.
Pabon's conviction is part of a global investigation into
allegations that banks colluded in setting benchmark rates such
as Libor (London interbank offered rate), against which rates on
hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of contracts and loans
are set across the world.
Around a dozen of the world's largest banks have been fined
about $9 billion pounds as part of the investigation and about
30 traders have been charged in the UK and United States.
The Court of Appeal also said there was no room for complacency
and the case stood as a "stark reminder of the need for those
instructing expert witnesses to satisfy themselves as to the
witness' expertise and to engage - difficult though it sometimes
may be - an expert of a suitable calibre".
Rowe did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Pabon and former Barclays traders Peter Johnson, Jonathan Mathew
and Jay Merchant in 2016 brought to five the number of bankers
convicted in Britain over Libor rigging after Tom Hayes, a
former UBS <UBSG.S> and Citigroup <C.N> trader, was jailed in
2015.
Hayes, who is serving an 11-year sentence, and Mathew, serving a
four-year term, have asked the independent Criminal Cases Review
Commission (CCRC) to review their cases. The CCRC examines
potential miscarriages of justice.
(Reporting by Kirstin Ridley; editing by Simon Jessop and John
Stonestreet)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|