Judge
rejects Massachusetts challenge to Trump birth control
rules
Send a link to a friend
[March 13, 2018] By
Nate Raymond
BOSTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on
Monday rejected a lawsuit by Massachusetts' attorney general challenging
new rules by President Donald Trump's administration that make it easier
for employers to avoid providing insurance that covers women's birth
control.
|
U.S. District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Boston dismissed a lawsuit
by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey that sought to block
rules that provide exemptions from an Obamacare mandate requiring
such coverage on moral or religious grounds.
The ruling came after two other judges in California and
Pennsylvania in December issued preliminary injunctions blocking the
Republican president's administration from enforcing the rules,
which it announced in October.
Gorton said that in contrast to those two states, where there is "no
doubt" employers intend to take advantage of the exemptions, "the
record is uniquely obscure" as to whether any in Massachusetts
would.
He noted that after the new rules were announced, Massachusetts
enacted a law in November called the ACCESS Act that required
employer-sponsored health plans to cover birth control without
imposing co-pays.
As a result, Gorton said that state law provided reasons to believe
Massachusetts women were less likely to be affected by the federal
rules, undercutting Healey's claim that the state would be injured
by them and that she had standing to sue.
"While we are disappointed in today's decision, we remain steadfast
in our commitment to ensuring affordable and reliable reproductive
health care for women," Healey, a Democrat, said in a statement. "We
will continue to fight for these protections."
[to top of second column] |
The U.S. Justice Department, which is defending the rules, had no
immediate comment.
The lawsuit is among several that Democratic state attorneys general
filed after the Trump administration on Oct. 6 unveiled the rules,
which targeted the contraceptive mandate implemented as part of
2010's Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.
The rules allow businesses or nonprofits to lodge religious or moral
objections to obtain an exemption from the law's mandate that
employers provide contraceptive coverage in health insurance with no
co-payment.
Conservative Christian activists and congressional Republicans
praised the move, while reproductive rights advocates and Democrats
criticized it.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond; Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Peter
Cooney)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|