“The concept is called the ripple effect and it means that weight
loss interventions delivered to one spouse have unintended, but
positive benefits on the other spouse,” said study coauthor Amy
Gorin, Associate Professor in Psychological Sciences at the
University of Connecticut in Storrs. “That is, spouses that are not
actively involved in (a diet) treatment also tend to lose weight.”
Gorin and colleagues note in the journal Obesity that weight within
couples tends to be proportionally equivalent between partners at
the outset.
Couples committed to health tend to enhance each other’s motivation
and adherence to diet and exercise-related behaviors. But the
opposite is also true. If one partner becomes obese during the
course of the relationship, there is a good chance the other will
too, the authors note.
The new findings suggest, however, that just because one partner
isn’t actively receiving weight loss guidance doesn’t necessarily
mean he or she won’t reap the same rewards as the health-seeking
significant other.
Gorin’s team studied 128 co-habiting hetero and homosexual couples
over a six-month period. Most couples were married. Everyone in the
study was overweight or obese.
Half of the couples were assigned to have one partner participate in
the Weight Watchers diet program. That partner received 6 months of
free access to in-person meetings and online tools including
self-monitoring of food intake, activity and weight. A Weight
Watchers support staff member was also available 24/7 if needed.
In each of the remaining couples, one partner received a weight loss
handout with basic information on healthy eating, physical activity
and weight management strategies.
Access to either program went to the person most interested in
weight loss, while the other partner, irrespective of group,
received nothing at all.
Three months into the study, “treated” partners in the Weight
Watchers group had lost more weight than treated partners in the
self-guided group. By six months that difference had disappeared.
Researchers were more interested, however, in how “untreated”
partners fared. And in fact, the untreated partners lost weight,
too, no matter which group they were assigned to.
[to top of second column] |
Non-dieting spouses lost an average of 1.30 kg (nearly 3 lb)at 3
months and 2.02 kg (about 4.5 lb) at month 6, regardless of group.
What’s more, by 6 months, 32 percent of non-dieting spouses in both
groups had lost at least 3 percent of their initial body weight,
coauthor Gary Foster told Reuters in an email. Foster is Chief
Scientific Officer at Weight Watchers International, which funded
the study.
Three percent was the researchers’ minimum for “successful” weight
loss, based on obesity management guidelines.
“What is most interesting to me about the study is that . . . they
found the interventions were equally effective,” said Megan Lewis,
Director of Patient and Family Engagement Research Program Center
for Communication Science RTI International, who was not involved in
the study.
“The fact that the study found a minimally intensive, self-guided
intervention was as effective as the Weight Watchers intervention
suggests that the benefits of weight loss can spread within couples,
and (individuals) may not need expensive or structured programs for
this benefit to occur,” she told Reuters Health by email.
The researchers observed that weight-loss trajectories between the
“treated” and untreated partners were highly correlated. For
example, if one couple member showed a higher likelihood of losing
weight, so did the other member. The reverse was also true.
The bottom line is that weight loss efforts spread and have effects
beyond the individual.
“There’s power in community when it comes to healthy behavior
change,” Foster said.
Still, more work needs to be done to fully understand this ripple
effect.
“We need more research to understand how to harness the power of
behavior change within households,” Gorin said by email. “Spouses
clearly influence each others’ weight-related choices. But how can
we leverage this within interventions to produce greater and more
sustained changes?”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2pc02r2 Obesity, online February 1, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |