Judge says no decision for at least a
month in Kansas voter ID case
Send a link to a friend
[March 20, 2018]
By Kevin Murphy
KANSAS CITY, Kan. (Reuters) - Lawyers
presented closing arguments on Monday in the trial of a legal challenge
to a Kansas law requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote,
with opponents calling the statute illegal and supporters deeming it
necessary to fight voter fraud.
The seven-day, non-jury trial in Kansas City drew to a conclusion as
U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson said she was taking the case under
submission and would not render a decision for at least a month.
The Kansas law, which took effect in 2013, requires individuals to
present a U.S. passport, birth certificate or other proof of citizenship
in order to register to vote. Several other Republican-led state
legislatures have enacted similar measures in recent years.
Critics argue that voter ID laws are designed to suppress groups of the
electorate that tend to support the Democratic Party, such as the young
and minorities. Proponents say they help ensure the integrity of
elections.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit in February 2016
challenging the Kansas law as a violation of the National Voter
Registration Act, which allows individuals to register to vote at state
motor vehicles offices with no more documentation than they would need
to obtain a driver's license.
Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a Republican who is running for
governor and is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, argued in court
that 129 non-U.S. citizens had voted or registered to vote in Kansas
since 2000, a number he said was merely the “tip of the iceberg.”
He cited expert witnesses who testified for the state that
extrapolations from the 129 known cases could mean a total number of
illegally registered voters ranging from 1,067 to 33,001 in Kansas,
given the state's population.
But lawyers for the ACLU contended that all but a handful of those 129
people were registered due to clerical errors, misunderstandings or
other unintentional reasons, and that most did not vote.
“That iceberg, upon closer inspection, is an ice cube,” ACLU lead
attorney Dale Ho said in his closing argument. “There is no evidence it
is in the thousands, as Secretary Kobach asserts.”
[to top of second column]
|
Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach talks about the Kansas voter
ID law that he pushed to combat what he believes to be rampant voter
fraud in the United States in his office in Topeka, Kansas, U.S., on
May 12, 2016. REUTERS/Dave Kaup/File Photo
Kobach countered that even a small number of illegal voters could
throw the outcome of an election. He also argued that the vast
majority of Kansas residents have and can readily obtain the
documents they need under the ID law.
“There is no evidence that people who are U.S. citizens are
prevented from voting by virtue of the Kansas law,” Kobach said in
closing.
The ACLU has estimated that more than 35,000 citizens in Kansas were
blocked from registering to vote from 2013 to 2016.
Kobach previously served on a commission appointed by U.S. President
Donald Trump to investigate voter fraud. Trump contended, without
evidence, that millions of people voted illegally in the 2016
presidential election he won. The commission was shut down in
January. Most state election officials and election law experts say
that U.S. voter fraud is rare.
Lawmakers in 23 states have imposed new voting restrictions since
2010, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York
University School of Law.
This year, lawmakers in eight states have introduced bills imposing
photo identification requirements for voting, but in two of those
states the bills failed to win enough support for passage, the
Brennan Center said.
(Reporting by Kevin Murphy in Kansas City, Kan.; Additional
reporting by ALex Dobuzinskis in Los Angeles; Editing by Steve
Gorman and Leslie Adler)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |