Supreme Court rejects Arizona challenge
to 'Dreamers' program
Send a link to a friend
[March 20, 2018]
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Monday required Arizona to continue to issue driver's licenses
to the young adult immigrants known as Dreamers, refusing to hear the
state's challenge to an Obama-era program that protects hundreds of
thousands of people brought into the country illegally as children.
The case centered on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
program created in 2012 under Democratic former President Barack Obama
that Republican President Donald Trump already has sought to rescind.
Those who signed up for DACA are shielded from deportation and given
work permits.
The high court refused to hear Republican-governed Arizona's appeal of a
lower court ruling that barred the state from denying driver's licenses
to people protected under DACA.
Mark Brnovich, Arizona's Republican attorney general, expressed
disappointment that the justices sidestepped the issue of whether Obama
had the authority to create DACA.
"Our case has always been about more than just driver's licenses,"
Brnovich said in a statement. "It's about the separation of powers and
whether the president, any president, can unilaterally act and bypass
Congress to create new laws."
The American Civil Liberties Union sued Arizona on behalf of a group of
DACA recipients who were denied driver's licenses, saying the state had
infringed on federal powers to make immigration policy. Arizona was the
only state to deny licenses to DACA recipients, according to court
papers.
"Arizona's inexplicable attempt to deny driver's licenses to Dreamers,
pursued by two governors for years, has now failed at every level of the
federal judiciary," ACLU attorney Jennifer Chang Newell said.
The justices on Feb. 26 required the Trump administration to keep DACA
in place at least for now, turning away its appeal of a judge's
nationwide injunction that halted the president's September order to
begin winding down the program in March.
[to top of second column]
|
The Trump administration had urged the justices not to hear
Arizona's appeal, saying the president's move to rescind the policy
means the state's concerns have already been addressed.
A second federal judge has issued a similar injunction keeping DACA
in place.
After DACA was implemented under Obama, Arizona's governor at the
time, Republican Jan Brewer, directed state officials to prevent the
program's recipients from obtaining a driver's license in the state.
Non-citizens must prove they are authorized to be in the United
States to obtain an Arizona driver's license, such as with a valid
federal work permit. The state decided not to accept permits
obtained by DACA recipients.
DACA recipients are called Dreamers in reference to legislation that
has failed to pass in the U.S. Congress called the DREAM Act, short
for Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year
struck down the Arizona policy, ruling that the state cannot develop
its own definition of immigrants who are authorized to be in the
United States and that only the federal government had that power.
Arizona appealed to the Supreme Court, saying the 9th Circuit's
decision ran roughshod over state sovereignty. Arizona said DACA was
enacted through a Department of Homeland Security memo, not
legislation in the U.S. Congress or a formal agency rule-making
process, and could not supersede state law regulating driver's
licenses.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |