Judge denies motion to drop case against
widow of Orlando gunman
Send a link to a friend
[March 27, 2018]
By Joey Roulette
ORLANDO, Fla. (Reuters) - A judge on Monday
denied a defense motion to dismiss charges against the widow of the
gunman in the 2016 massacre at Orlando's Pulse nightclub, saying that
the gunman's father's work an FBI informant was not relevant to the
case.
Over the weekend, prosecutors disclosed that Omar Mateen's father,
Seddique, had worked with the Federal Bureau of Investigation before his
son carried out the massacre of 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in June
2016.
In opening their case, lawyers for Mateen's widow, Noor Salman, argued
that the judge should dismiss the charges against her or declare a
mistrial because prosecutors had failed to reveal the FBI's relationship
to Mateen's father and other evidence related to him beforehand.
Salman, 31, is accused of helping her husband carry out surveillance of
possible attack sites and doing nothing to stop him. Mateen, a U.S.
citizen of Afghan descent who claimed allegiance to a member of the
Islamic State militant group, was killed by police after more than three
hours in the Pulse nightclub.
An FBI agent on Monday testified that years before Mateen carried out
the attack, the agency considered using him as an informant, like his
father.
Those discussions took place while the FBI was investigating comments
made by the younger Mateen about overseas links to militants, Special
Agent Juvenal Martin said in federal court in Orlando. That
investigation closed without charges, he said.
Martin did not say why the FBI decided against enlisting Omar Mateen as
an informant.
Salman's attorneys say that the disclosure by prosecutors that Seddique
Mateen had been an informant from January 2005 to June 2016 violated a
Supreme Court ruling barring prosecutors from withholding evidence.
[to top of second column]
|
Investigators work the scene following a mass shooting at the Pulse
gay nightclub in Orlando Florida, U.S. on June 12, 2016.
REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo
After resting their case, prosecutors said agents probing the
nightclub rampage found receipts of money transfers made from the
United States to Turkey and Afghanistan made by the elder Mateen. An
active investigation was under way, they said.
If the defense had known about the transfers, it would have
investigated whether Seddique Mateen was involved in the attack or
had prior knowledge of it, Fritz Scheller, a lawyer for Salman, said
in the motion to dismiss.
But U.S. District Judge Paul Byron said, "It is not clear whether
the purpose of the transfers was illegal."
He said the omission of any evidence related to Seddique Mateen had
no bearing on the culpability of Salman.
Salman faces possible life in prison if convicted on charges of
aiding her husband in the attack and obstructing an investigation.
(Reporting by Joey Roulette; Additional reporting and writing by
Frank McGurty; Editing by James Dalgleish and Leslie Adler)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|