Trump has all but decided to withdraw
from Iran nuclear deal: sources
Send a link to a friend
[May 03, 2018]
By Steve Holland and Arshad Mohammed
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President
Donald Trump has all but decided to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear
accord by May 12 but exactly how he will do so remains unclear, two
White House officials and a source familiar with the administration's
internal debate said on Wednesday.
There is a chance Trump might choose to keep the United States in the
international pact under which Iran agreed to curb its nuclear program
in return for sanctions relief, in part because of "alliance
maintenance" with France and to save face for French President Emmanuel
Macron, who met Trump last week and urged him to stay in, the source
said.
A decision by Trump to end U.S. sanctions relief would all but sink the
agreement and could trigger a backlash by Iran, which could resume its
nuclear arms program or "punish" U.S. allies in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and
Lebanon, diplomats said.
Technically, Trump must decide by May 12 whether to renew "waivers"
suspending some of the U.S. sanctions on Iran. One of the White House
officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said it was possible Trump
will end up with a decision that "is not a full pullout" but was unable
to describe what that might look like.
A presentation by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday
about what he said was documentary evidence of Tehran's past nuclear
arms program could give Trump a fresh argument to withdraw, even though
U.N. inspectors say Iran has complied with the terms of the deal.
Iran has denied ever seeking nuclear weapons and accuses its arch-foe
Israel of stirring up world suspicions against it.
The pact between Iran and six major powers - Britain, China, France,
Germany, Russia and the United States - was among former U.S. President
Barack Obama's signature foreign policies but has been described by
Trump as "one of the worst deals I have ever witnessed."
The White House official said Trump was "most of the way there toward
pulling out of the deal but he hasn't made the decision" and that he
"seems poised to do it but until a decision is made by this president it
is not final."
Top aides are not seeking aggressively to talk Trump out of withdrawal
because he seems intent on it, a second White House official said.
EUROPEANS LOSING HOPE
Trump gave Britain, France and Germany a May 12 deadline to fix what he
views as the deal's flaws - its failure to address Iran's ballistic
missile program, the terms by which inspectors visit suspect Iranian
sites, and "sunset" clauses under which some of its terms expire - or he
will reimpose U.S. sanctions.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump addresses a joint news conference with
Nigeria's President Muhammadu Buhari in the Rose Garden of the White
House in Washington, U.S., April 30, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
While European officials continue to work toward such a "fix," they
believe the odds are against reaching one.
One of the main sticking points has to do with the "sunsets," where
the United States in effect wishes to find a way to extend some of
the limits on Iran's nuclear program beyond their expiration dates
under the agreement.
The source familiar with the debate said U.S. negotiators are
hamstrung by the fact that they do not really know where Trump's
"red line" is and so they cannot tell the Europeans what would
secure Trump's blessing.
Trump could refuse to renew the waivers but give new U.S. Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo time to negotiate more with the Europeans,
exploiting the deal's dispute resolution mechanism or the time
before the most draconian sanctions take effect.
Several sources familiar with the negotiations said that if Trump
pulls out, a question for the Europeans will be whether this would
be the start of a much harder U.S. line toward Iran, including
military confrontation.
"The Europeans are not keen to be dragged into a regional conflict
by the U.S.," said one source familiar with the talks.
Two U.S. intelligence officials said they were particularly
concerned about Iranian retaliation in harder-to-trace actions such
as cyber attacks on the United States or its allies and attacks on
soft targets by people without obvious ties to Tehran.
Such attacks are considered more likely than actions that might
trigger a U.S. military response against Iranian nuclear and
military targets.
(Reporting by Steve Holland and Arshad Mohammed; additional
reporting by John Walcott, Jonathan Landay and Lesley Wroughton;
editing by Yara Bayoumy and Grant McCool)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |