"Based on the latest scientific evidence, the Task Force hopes that
men ages 55 to 69 who are considering prostate cancer screening and
their doctors will have an open conversation about the benefits and
harms of screening, so men can choose whether screening is right for
them," Dr. Alex Krist, USPSTF vice chair from Virginia Commonwealth
University in Richmond, told Reuters Health in an email.
A man's lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is
about 13 percent, but the lifetime risk of dying of prostate cancer
is only 2.5 percent, with half of those deaths occurring at age 80
or beyond, the Task Force authors note in their recommendation
statement published on Tuesday in JAMA.
According to results of clinical studies, prostate cancer screening
with the PSA (prostate-specific antigen) blood test could prevent
approximately 1.3 deaths from prostate cancer over 13 years per
1,000 men screened. It might also prevent 3 cases of prostate cancer
that has already spread per 1,000 men screened.
But there is no evidence that prostate cancer screening improves
overall survival.
And there can be downsides of screening, including false-positive
results that require additional testing and prostate biopsy,
overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and treatment complications like
incontinence and impotence.
Based on this information, the USPSTF recommends that men between
the ages of 55 and 69 be provided this information and that their
doctors not screen men who don't express a preference for screening.
For men aged 70 years and older, USPSTF discourages prostate cancer
screening, because it has shown no benefit on prostate
cancer-related death rates in this age group.
For two groups of men known to have a higher risk of prostate cancer
- African American men and men with prostate cancer in their family
- there isn't enough information to make a firm recommendation about
screening, so USPSTF strongly encourages additional research to
identify the best strategy for these men.
"While we know that African American men and men with a family
history are more likely to get prostate cancer and more likely to
die from prostate cancer, we don't know if screening offers them any
greater benefit," Krist said. "Men at higher risk for prostate
cancer should talk about this with their doctor when considering
whether to be screened, but they should also weigh the potential
benefits and harms when deciding whether screening is right for
them."
[to top of second column] |
It's important for all men to be informed, because existing
guidelines have slightly different recommendations. The American
Academy of Family Physicians and the Canadian Task Force on
Preventive Health Care recommend against PSA-based screening for
prostate cancer, while the American College of Physicians, the
American Urological Association and the American Cancer Society
recommend shared decisionmaking but differ in certain details from
one another and the USPSTF recommendations.
"Different men will weigh the potential benefits and harms
differently, so the most important thing for them to do is talk with
their doctor - armed with the research and guidance provided by our
recommendation - so that they can make an informed decision based on
their values and individual situation," Krist said.
A JAMA patient page with background on prostate cancer and a summary
of the new recommendation is available on the journal's website
(https://bit.ly/2jF4Wuq).
"We think that the important part of this recommendation, which
should be stressed, is that we should let each man decide himself,
based on his own perception of the risks and benefits, whether he
wants to be screened," said Dr. Danny Vespini and genetic counselor
Justin Lorentz, who run the Male Oncology Research & Education
Program at the University of Toronto and were not involved in the
USPSTF guidelines.
"Men with a family history of prostate cancer, who are West African
or Caribbean ancestry, or who have an inherited gene mutation that
predisposes them to prostate cancer, should be told that the
recommendations do not fully apply to them, and they definitely
should talk to their doctor about prostate cancer screening if they
aren't already having it done," they said in an email.
"Our group and many others are actively doing research in
identifying biomarkers of aggressive disease in the active
surveillance population, so that someday men diagnosed with early
disease that does not pose any threat to their lives can avoid
unnecessary and morbid therapies," they added.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2KGOZjD JAMA, online May 8, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|