How Trump's steel tariffs kick the can business
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [May 10, 2018] 
		 By Nick Carey 
		 
		WOODLAND, Calif. (Reuters) - Dan Vincent is 
		in a bind. 
		 
		The president of Pacific Coast Producers (PCP) plans to use around 700 
		million tin-coated steel cans this year for tomatoes, peaches and pears 
		from 168 growers here in California. 
		 
		His cooperative then sells the canned fruits and vegetables to grocers 
		ranging from Walmart Inc to Kroger Co, as well as food services 
		companies such as Sysco Corp and a host of restaurant chains. 
		 
		Since President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on steel and 
		aluminum to help the domestic steel industry on March 20, PCP's steel 
		costs have jumped 9 percent as the market prices in the tariffs before 
		they even take effect. 
		 
		Vincent now expects his steel bill for the year to rise $18 million to 
		$20 million, forcing him to choose between taking a potential 75 percent 
		cut to his company's profits, or pushing the added costs to his retail 
		customers and eventually to consumers - many of whom are lower-income 
		Americans "who can least afford it," Vincent told Reuters. 
		 
		"Look, we all want to protect U.S. steelworkers," Vincent said while 
		touring a tomato farm in Woodland, California. "But we don't want to be 
		an unintended consequence of this." 
						
		
		  
						
		Meant to protect U.S. jobs and even out trade imbalances, the Trump 
		administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum are having a ripple 
		effect throughout the U.S. economy, from cars to aircraft to oilfield 
		pipes. Cans have a special significance in the debate over the pros and 
		cons of the policy. 
		 
		U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, during a March 2 appearance on 
		CNBC, held up a Campbell Soup Co can and said it only contained 2.6 
		cents worth of steel in it, equating to less than a one cent added cost 
		per can. 
		 
		"Who in the world is going to be too bothered by six tenths of a cent?" 
		Ross said. 
		 
		A Commerce Department spokesman said the figures Ross used were based on 
		the cost of tin plate steel and calculated for a 10.75 ounce (0.3kg) 
		can, adding steel is "only one component of the cost." 
		 
		Canning industry executives, however, say the cost of America's most 
		common 15 ounce (0.43kg) can is actually around 17 cents, and will rise 
		4 cents thanks to tariffs. 
		 
		Even a 10-ounce can costs food processors up to 14 cents, and should 
		cost 3 cents more with tariffs. 
		 
		Those pennies add up. If the cost of all 24 billion cans Americans use 
		annually went up 3 cents, it would generate an additional $720 million 
		in costs someone in the supply chain must eat, industry executives said. 
		 
		"Our members have razor-thin margins," said Nickolas George, president 
		of the Midwest Food Products Association, which represents Seneca Food 
		Corp and Del Monte Pacific Ltd, which both can fruit and vegetables, 
		among others. "Lower profits for them mean less innovation, less 
		investment, less expansion into new markets and less hiring." 
		 
		HIT TO THE POCKETBOOK 
		 
		For consumers, a spike in prices in the grocery aisle puts poorer 
		Americans at risk, U.S. government statistics show, because they spend 
		more of their budget on food than those in higher income brackets. 
		 
		For a graphic, click https://tmsnrt.rs/2I2OcYy 
						
		
		  
						
		The canning industry has made economic fairness part of its public 
		argument for canceling the tariffs. According to 2012 research 
		commissioned by the Can Manufacturers Institute, Americans on food 
		stamps and other food assistance programs consumed 7.1 cans of fruit and 
		vegetables every week, compared with the national weekly average of 5.5 
		cans. 
		 
		Retailers and companies like PCP work to keep the cost of canned fruit 
		and vegetables under 99 cents, which is what Vincent calls the "magic 
		number," a psychological threshold over which poorer U.S. consumers in 
		particular have historically walked away. 
						
		
		  
						
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            
			Pacific Coast Producers chairman Frank Muller holds a tomato 
			seedling at his farm in Woodland, California, U.S., April 27, 2018. 
			REUTERS/Noah Berger 
            
			  
"I'm afraid the tariffs are going to push us over that 99 cent threshold," 
Vincent said. 
 
A key question is whether Walmart will let producers pass on higher costs, as 
the retail giant is renowned for pushing back against price hikes, said Edward 
Jones analyst Brittany Weissman. 
 
Walmart referred Reuters to the Retail Industry Leaders Association trade group. 
Hun Quach, the group's vice president for international trade, said with tariffs 
"the bottom line is there is no other place for through costs to go than to 
consumers." 
Rivals for PCP in China and Europe, meanwhile, are seen getting a boost from 
steel tariffs. Canned fruit and vegetables imported into the United States will 
not be subject to tariffs because they are classified as finished goods, so 
foreign competitors are under no pressure to raise prices. 
 
PUTTING INVESTMENT ON HOLD 
 
The farmers in PCP's cooperative grow fruits and vegetables in the rich, 
sandy-loam soil of California's Central Valley, east of San Francisco. 
 
One of those farmers is Frank Muller, chairman of the cooperative's board and a 
second-generation tomato farmer. 
 
On the thousands of acres he farms, workers carefully drop young tomato plants 
into perfectly-formed holes, irrigated by underground strips to save water. New 
seeds and more precise planting techniques have helped Muller more than double 
the yield of his fields during the past three decades to 55 tons of tomatoes per 
acre. 
But at the same time, his costs have exploded. In just one example, he now pays 
$2,600 per 100,000 seeds up from $20 three decades ago. 
 
Muller had planned a new steel equipment storage building on his farm, but that 
investment is on hold, he said, due to uncertainty about the cost. 
 
"The tariffs hit me at both ends," Muller said. "It means higher input costs and 
it will hurt our end markets." 
  
Richard Elliot is another of PCP's farmers worried by tariffs. A 
fifth-generation pear grower, he said a broader trade war would hurt his exports 
to Canada and South America. But Elliot is more concerned steel tariffs will 
harm PCP, which he relies on to buy and can a significant portion of his crop. 
 
"We can't be in business unless PCP is doing well," he said. 
PCP has expanded over the years, investing in a fruit import business to can 
exotic fruit and a cherry-growing operation in Oregon. When a rival closed its 
Modesto, California, peach-canning plant earlier this year citing rising costs 
and "import competition from China and Europe," PCP took over that business. 
 
The 700 million cans PCP needs for this year's growing season will add close to 
$20 million in unplanned additional cost. The company had expected profit for 
this year of $24 million, but those extra steel costs could cut PCP's profits by 
up to $18 million, Vincent said. 
 
To cut costs, PCP will process the extra fruit without adding to its labor 
force. 
 
"There's a lot of money we could have made that will go into steel," PCP's 
Vincent said. 
 
(Reporting By Nick Carey; editing by Joe White and Edward Tobin) 
				 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			   |