How Trump's steel tariffs kick the can business
Send a link to a friend
[May 10, 2018]
By Nick Carey
WOODLAND, Calif. (Reuters) - Dan Vincent is
in a bind.
The president of Pacific Coast Producers (PCP) plans to use around 700
million tin-coated steel cans this year for tomatoes, peaches and pears
from 168 growers here in California.
His cooperative then sells the canned fruits and vegetables to grocers
ranging from Walmart Inc to Kroger Co, as well as food services
companies such as Sysco Corp and a host of restaurant chains.
Since President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on steel and
aluminum to help the domestic steel industry on March 20, PCP's steel
costs have jumped 9 percent as the market prices in the tariffs before
they even take effect.
Vincent now expects his steel bill for the year to rise $18 million to
$20 million, forcing him to choose between taking a potential 75 percent
cut to his company's profits, or pushing the added costs to his retail
customers and eventually to consumers - many of whom are lower-income
Americans "who can least afford it," Vincent told Reuters.
"Look, we all want to protect U.S. steelworkers," Vincent said while
touring a tomato farm in Woodland, California. "But we don't want to be
an unintended consequence of this."
Meant to protect U.S. jobs and even out trade imbalances, the Trump
administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum are having a ripple
effect throughout the U.S. economy, from cars to aircraft to oilfield
pipes. Cans have a special significance in the debate over the pros and
cons of the policy.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, during a March 2 appearance on
CNBC, held up a Campbell Soup Co can and said it only contained 2.6
cents worth of steel in it, equating to less than a one cent added cost
per can.
"Who in the world is going to be too bothered by six tenths of a cent?"
Ross said.
A Commerce Department spokesman said the figures Ross used were based on
the cost of tin plate steel and calculated for a 10.75 ounce (0.3kg)
can, adding steel is "only one component of the cost."
Canning industry executives, however, say the cost of America's most
common 15 ounce (0.43kg) can is actually around 17 cents, and will rise
4 cents thanks to tariffs.
Even a 10-ounce can costs food processors up to 14 cents, and should
cost 3 cents more with tariffs.
Those pennies add up. If the cost of all 24 billion cans Americans use
annually went up 3 cents, it would generate an additional $720 million
in costs someone in the supply chain must eat, industry executives said.
"Our members have razor-thin margins," said Nickolas George, president
of the Midwest Food Products Association, which represents Seneca Food
Corp and Del Monte Pacific Ltd, which both can fruit and vegetables,
among others. "Lower profits for them mean less innovation, less
investment, less expansion into new markets and less hiring."
HIT TO THE POCKETBOOK
For consumers, a spike in prices in the grocery aisle puts poorer
Americans at risk, U.S. government statistics show, because they spend
more of their budget on food than those in higher income brackets.
For a graphic, click https://tmsnrt.rs/2I2OcYy
The canning industry has made economic fairness part of its public
argument for canceling the tariffs. According to 2012 research
commissioned by the Can Manufacturers Institute, Americans on food
stamps and other food assistance programs consumed 7.1 cans of fruit and
vegetables every week, compared with the national weekly average of 5.5
cans.
Retailers and companies like PCP work to keep the cost of canned fruit
and vegetables under 99 cents, which is what Vincent calls the "magic
number," a psychological threshold over which poorer U.S. consumers in
particular have historically walked away.
[to top of second column] |
Pacific Coast Producers chairman Frank Muller holds a tomato
seedling at his farm in Woodland, California, U.S., April 27, 2018.
REUTERS/Noah Berger
"I'm afraid the tariffs are going to push us over that 99 cent threshold,"
Vincent said.
A key question is whether Walmart will let producers pass on higher costs, as
the retail giant is renowned for pushing back against price hikes, said Edward
Jones analyst Brittany Weissman.
Walmart referred Reuters to the Retail Industry Leaders Association trade group.
Hun Quach, the group's vice president for international trade, said with tariffs
"the bottom line is there is no other place for through costs to go than to
consumers."
Rivals for PCP in China and Europe, meanwhile, are seen getting a boost from
steel tariffs. Canned fruit and vegetables imported into the United States will
not be subject to tariffs because they are classified as finished goods, so
foreign competitors are under no pressure to raise prices.
PUTTING INVESTMENT ON HOLD
The farmers in PCP's cooperative grow fruits and vegetables in the rich,
sandy-loam soil of California's Central Valley, east of San Francisco.
One of those farmers is Frank Muller, chairman of the cooperative's board and a
second-generation tomato farmer.
On the thousands of acres he farms, workers carefully drop young tomato plants
into perfectly-formed holes, irrigated by underground strips to save water. New
seeds and more precise planting techniques have helped Muller more than double
the yield of his fields during the past three decades to 55 tons of tomatoes per
acre.
But at the same time, his costs have exploded. In just one example, he now pays
$2,600 per 100,000 seeds up from $20 three decades ago.
Muller had planned a new steel equipment storage building on his farm, but that
investment is on hold, he said, due to uncertainty about the cost.
"The tariffs hit me at both ends," Muller said. "It means higher input costs and
it will hurt our end markets."
Richard Elliot is another of PCP's farmers worried by tariffs. A
fifth-generation pear grower, he said a broader trade war would hurt his exports
to Canada and South America. But Elliot is more concerned steel tariffs will
harm PCP, which he relies on to buy and can a significant portion of his crop.
"We can't be in business unless PCP is doing well," he said.
PCP has expanded over the years, investing in a fruit import business to can
exotic fruit and a cherry-growing operation in Oregon. When a rival closed its
Modesto, California, peach-canning plant earlier this year citing rising costs
and "import competition from China and Europe," PCP took over that business.
The 700 million cans PCP needs for this year's growing season will add close to
$20 million in unplanned additional cost. The company had expected profit for
this year of $24 million, but those extra steel costs could cut PCP's profits by
up to $18 million, Vincent said.
To cut costs, PCP will process the extra fruit without adding to its labor
force.
"There's a lot of money we could have made that will go into steel," PCP's
Vincent said.
(Reporting By Nick Carey; editing by Joe White and Edward Tobin)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|