Lawsuit against U.S. border searches of
phones can move forward: judge
Send a link to a friend
[May 11, 2018]
By Nate Raymond
BOSTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on
Thursday rejected the Trump administration's bid to dismiss a lawsuit
challenging the federal government's growing practice of conducting
warrantless searches on phones and laptops of Americans stopped at the
border.
U.S. District Judge Denise Capser in Boston ruled that the lawsuit by 11
travelers had raised a plausible claim that such border searches violate
the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against
unreasonable searches and seizures.
While Casper described the law as unclear, she said the issue was not
unlike a major privacy rights case the U.S. Supreme Court decided in
2014 in which it held police must obtain a warrant to search an arrested
suspect's cellphone.
The judge said that Supreme Court ruling "indicates that electronic
devices implicate privacy interests in a fundamentally different manner
than searches of typical containers or even searches of a person."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e55/36e5504a64339885e8de77b7e3ec4e55edb41520" alt=""
"In sum, the Court is not persuaded that Plaintiffs have failed to state
a plausible Fourth Amendment claim here," Casper wrote.
She also rejected the government's arguments that the plaintiffs, 10
U.S. citizens and one permanent resident, lacked standing to pursue the
case.
The ruling was welcomed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the
Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of the
travelers, whose devices were searched by border officers as they
re-entered the country.
"The court has rightly recognized the severity of the privacy violations
that travelers face when the government conducts suspicionless border
searches of electronics," ACLU attorney Esha Bhandari said in a
statement.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a422f/a422f4604708c27b6218bb154cc34a5df6c84f79" alt=""
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer prepares to search a
vehicle at the Mexico-U.S. border port of entry in Hidalgo, Texas,
U.S., April 13, 2018. REUTERS/Loren Elliott
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/141b9/141b93ed475a9b9fd35197cfd10c44e054386975" alt=""
The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) declined to comment.
According to the ACLU, the number of electronic device searches at
the border has been increasing since 2016 and has grown even more
during Republican President Donald Trump's administration.
According to fiscal year data from the CBP, searches of electronic
devices climbed from about 8,500 in 2015 to about 19,000 in 2016 and
32,000 2017.
The lawsuit was filed in September by travelers including a military
veteran, a National Aeronautics and Space Administration engineer,
two journalists and a computer programmer. Several of the plaintiffs
are Muslim or minorities.
Generally in the United States, law enforcement is required to
obtain a warrant before it can search an American's electronic
devices.
But a so-called border search exception allows federal authorities
to conduct searches within 100 miles (160 km) of a U.S. border
without a warrant.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef836/ef8365b968ba4b09fd21f2a4279e09f7c61c38b2" alt="" |