Shipping's financiers turning the tide on shipbreaking
practices
Send a link to a friend
[May 15, 2018]
By Jonathan Saul and Simon Jessop
LONDON (Reuters) - The shipping industry has long been criticized by
campaigners for allowing vessels to be broken up on beaches, endangering
workers and polluting the sea and sand.
Now, it is being called to account from a quarter that may have a bit
more clout - its financial backers.
Norway's $1 trillion Oil Fund, a leader in ethical investing, in
February sold its stake in four firms because they scrap on the beach.
Three of the firms excluded by Norway's fund - Taiwan's Evergreen
Marine, Precious Shipping and Thoresen Thai Agencies (TTA) of Thailand -
say they have been unfairly singled out. The fourth, Korea Line,
declined to comment.
Norwegian life insurer KLP soon followed, selling shares in the one of
the four it owned and blacklisting the other three.
Further exclusions are likely, said KLP, the fund and its advisory
Council on Ethics. The council's chief adviser, Aslak Skancke, said the
divestments had already effected wider change, including encouraging
companies to seek cleaner scrapping.
The fund contacted several firms in its portfolio during its
investigation, Skancke said, "and when we made them aware of the
possibility of exclusion from the fund, they ... decided to change their
policy." He declined to name the companies.
Three leading pensions funds - Caisse de Depot, CCP and OMERS - are
reviewing their investments in shipping over ethical and green
considerations, a finance source familiar with the matter said. OMERS
declined to comment. Caisse de Depot and CCP did not respond to requests
for comment.
The steps add to momentum on the issue from European Union regulators
and courts, in particular pressure to measure up to standards for
inclusion on the EU's list of approved ship-breaking yards, which is due
to be updated later this year.
It's a revolution that has been a long time coming, environmental, labor
and human rights activists say. But a transition won't be easy, for
owners or breakers.
More than 80 percent of ageing commercial ships are broken up on the
beaches of Bangladesh, Pakistan and India. Industry leaders in South
Asia say they cannot afford to upgrade their sites and remain
competitive.
And not all beaching is the same. In its most criticized forms, workers
cut up ships with little more than their hands and blowtorches, with
parts and pollutants dropping directly onto the sand. Other sites have
cranes, impermeable surfaces and safety standards for workers and
equipment.
"No one has ever really been able to come up with a reasonable
definition" of beaching, said John Stawpert, manager for environment and
trade at the International Chamber of Shipping, which represents most of
the world's merchant fleet.
"If there was to be a blanket ban on 'beaching' there would be a very,
very serious capacity problem because there is nowhere else big enough
to deal with it at the moment," he said.
Beaching in South Asia also pays more, an important consideration as the
shipping industry emerges from a decade in the doldrums due to
over-ordering of ships and slowing global trade, 90 percent of which is
transported by sea.
Financial sources estimate shipping companies face a $30 billion funding
gap in 2018, because even though the business is recovering, they are
still not getting enough money from banks who are constrained by
stricter capital requirements.
Commerzbank has said it will exit shipping financing and invest its
capital elsewhere; others, such as Deutsche Bank, say they aim to cut
their exposure to the sector.
FINANCING
Leading Dutch shipping finance houses ABN AMRO and ING, Sweden's Nordea,
Norway's DNB and Denmark's Danske Bank, as well as the Netherlands' NIBC,
say they are taking a hard look at their borrowers' policies.
"We believe actors that do not take the environmental and social risk
seriously will have problems accessing capital markets in the future,"
said Kristin Holth, DNB's leader for Ocean Industries.
Most of the 18 institutional investors contacted by Reuters said they
preferred engagement to divestment, at least at first.
Sasja Beslik, head of group sustainable finance at Nordea, said the bank
had "no issue with divestments - we've done that over the years and are
not afraid of doing that."
But he added that in the case of ship breaking, the approach for now was
to encourage companies to "take responsibility".
A spokesman for ABN AMRO said in a statement if clients did not comply
with the bank's sustainability policies, there would be "a phase of
engagement".
"If engagement is without result, the ultimate consequence is that the
relationship with (the) client will be ended," he added.
Europe has a powerful voice as the world's second-largest ship-owning
region after China, with an estimated $301 billion worth of tonnage,
according to valuation company VesselsValue.
[to top of second column] |
A worker sorts out the engine parts of a decommissioned ship as he
dismantles it at the Alang shipyard in the western Indian state of
Gujarat, March 27, 2015. REUTERS/Amit Dave/File Photo
The EU's decision to draw up a list of approved ship-breaking yards in December
2016 was the first regulatory step with real teeth; the Hong Kong Convention on
recycling drawn up in 2009 does not take a position on beaching and has only a
handful of signatories so far.
Courts in Europe are playing a role, too. In March, Dutch company Seatrade and
two of its directors were found guilty of violating rules banning the transport
of waste from the EU to India when it sailed ships there to have them
demolished, one of the first criminal cases of its kind.
The case "sets an important precedent", said Ingvild Jenssen, founder and
coordinator of NGO Shipbreaking Platform, a coalition of environmental, human
and labor rights organizations formed in 2005 which has mapped out direct links
between shipowners and beaching operations.
Skancke said Shipbreaking Platform's work played an important role in its
decision to divest.
BEACHING
In beaching, ships are run to ground in inter-tidal areas that would normally
teem with sea life.
Oil, sludge, paint chips and slag can get washed out to sea with the tide,
environmental and rights campaigners say. Other toxic materials, like asbestos,
get absorbed into the sand.
The yards - centered in Pakistan (mainly Gadani), India (Alang) and Bangladesh (Chittagong)
- employ tens of thousands of people, of whom dozens are killed each year, the
campaigners say. An oil tanker blast in 2016 in Gadani killed at least 26
workers and injured dozens.
Government officials and shipowners say conditions have improved significantly
in recent years.
"From the day of the (Gadani) accident until this day improvements have been
brought at the yards, like working conditions," Hashim Gilzai, the government
commissioner with administrative control over the yard, told Reuters.
Bangladesh passed regulations in January to upgrade facilities and impose
tougher penalties, said Shamsul Areefin, additional secretary with the ministry
of industries.
The challenge was how to put expensive infrastructure in place while remaining
cost competitive, said Nitin Kanakiya, secretary of India's Ship Recycling
Industries Association.
"We cannot afford these huge capital investments," he said. "And if we invest
this much, our economic significance will go away."
FUND'S METHODS DISPUTED
Taiwan's Evergreen, one of the four firms excluded by the Norwegian fund, said
it "specifically demanded" that vessels be broken up at certified green
recycling shipyards. TTA said it was compliant with all international rules and
regulations.
Khalid Hashim, managing director of Precious Shipping, one of Thailand's largest
dry cargo ship owners, disputed the way the fund was going about its goal
because it would be easy to sell ageing ships to third parties before their end
of life.
"In that case we would be whiter than the snow that falls in Norway but the
buyers of our ships would, a few years later, scrap the ships at the beaches of
the Indian sub-continent."
Skancke said the fund's actions were just the beginning of a process, starting
with Pakistan and Bangladesh.
"Now the question remains, can you still do this in a responsible manner?" he
said. "And that is a question that will have implications for how we view
companies which send ships for beaching in India."
The ICS's Stawpert said continuing improvements in South Asia operations would
allow the region to remain at the center of global ship-breaking.
But Shipbreaking Platform's Jenssen said that was not possible as long as
beaching continued.
"Our role is to promote clean and safe solutions and to make sure that there is
no double standard in the way the environment and workers are protected around
the world," she said.
"It is key to make sure that the surrounding environment is not contaminated.
This is impossible on a tidal beach, as is cleaning up an oil spill."
(Additional reporting by Joyce Lee in Seoul, Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen,
Joachim Dagenborg and Gwladys Fouche in Oslo, Syed Raza Hassan and Drazen Jorgic
in Islamabad, Ruma Paul in Dhaka and Sudarshan Varadhan in New Delhi; Editing by
Sonya Hepinstall)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|