Researchers surveyed 610 parents from across the U.S. with at least
one child between the ages of 6 and 17. Parents were randomly
assigned to view a series of four 90-second video clips from popular
films depicting gun violence under either justified or unjustified
conditions, with graphic consequences removed to mimic the level of
blood and guts typical in PG-13 movies.
After they saw each clip, parents were asked the same series of
questions about their emotional response to the scene, whether the
major character was justified in using violence, the appropriate age
to view the movie, and whether they would let their own child see
it.
Overall, parents were less emotionally upset and more accepting of a
child viewing gun violence they perceived as justified, researchers
report in Pediatrics.
But most parents also thought even justified violence wasn't
appropriate for children to see until at least age 15, older than
the PG-13 rating suggests.
"Even though these (PG-13) movies have more gun violence than
R-rated movies, the violence is sanitized regarding the consequences
of violence (no blood or suffering) and it is likely to be seen as
justified (having noble characters using guns to defend themselves
or loved ones)," said lead study author Dan Romer of the Annenberg
Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania in
Philadelphia.
"The problem is that the rating allows anyone to get into a theater
to watch such movies, and it may be teaching children that it's
acceptable to use guns to resolve conflicts," Romer said by email.
"We don’t have direct evidence for that, but with our country having
a gun epidemic, it's a troubling possibility."
The clips of gun violence came from popular films rated PG-13,
meaning they're not appropriate for children 12 and under, or R,
meaning they're only appropriate for adults.
Researchers classified clips as depicting justified violence when
guns were used for things like protection, rescue or self-defense.
Violence was classified as unjustified when guns were used in
unprovoked attacks or without any underlying reason.
[to top of second column]
|
Parents who viewed gun violence they considered justified were more
likely to allow their own child to see the movie and were less
restrictive about what age it would be acceptable for children,
researchers report in Pediatrics.
With unjustified violence, parents thought it wasn’t appropriate for
children under 16.
While the study wasn't a controlled experiment designed to prove how
children react to violence they see on film, it offers fresh
evidence of how parents may think differently about justified versus
unjustified gun violence.
Ideally, if parents do let kids watch PG-13 movies, they shouldn't
let children watch alone, said Brad Bushman, a researcher at the
Ohio State University in Columbus who wasn't involved in the study.
"Research has shown that the effects of violent media on children
can be reduced if parents discuss it afterwards," Bushman said by
email. "However, if parents do not discuss the violence with their
children afterwards, the effects can be worse because the child
assumes the violence was perfectly acceptable if the parent said
nothing about it."
In reality, this may be harder said than done, especially because
the vast majority of gun violence children see on screens doesn't
happen in movie theaters, said Dr. Dimitri Christakis, director of
the Center for Child Health, Behavior & Development at Seattle
Children's Research Institute.
"The notion of parents judging appropriateness of screen violence
for children and thereby accompanying them to movies is a bit
dated," Christakis, who wasn't involved in the study, said by email.
"Children have long snuck in to R rated movies with relative ease
and now with ready access to streaming it's virtually impossible for
parents to exert much control over what their children watch."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2GdDPj2 Pediatrics, online May 14, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |