U.S. judges weigh fate of program
protecting young immigrants
Send a link to a friend
[May 16, 2018]
By Mica Rosenberg and Lucy Nicholson
NEW YORK/PASADENA, California (Reuters) - A
panel of three appeals court judges in California on Tuesday asked the
federal government to defend its decision to end a program protecting
from deportation some immigrants who came to the United States illegally
as children, who are often referred to as "Dreamers."
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals must rule on whether to uphold a
lower court's nationwide injunction ordering the government to keep the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in place while
litigation challenging its termination proceeds.
The administration of President Donald Trump announced in September it
would scrap the 2012 program launched by former President Barack Obama,
and said it was up to Congress to find a legislative solution.
Several plaintiffs, including the University of California, which
enrolls many DACA recipients, sued over the administration's decision,
and in January, U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco
issued the injunction. A judge in Brooklyn, New York, made a similar
finding, and a judge in Washington, D.C., gave the government extra time
to explain its reasoning.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the program was unlawful when
he announced the end of DACA, a position the appeals court judges asked
attorneys for the government to explain on Tuesday.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan responded that it was
within the government's discretion to decide the fate of the program.
"It is perfectly lawful to have a zero tolerance enforcement policy, but
it is potentially unlawful to not enforce the law on a large swath of
people," Mooppan said.
Lawyers for plaintiffs challenging DACA's termination argued that while
Obama was clearly within his rights to establish the program, its end
robbed hundreds of thousands of young immigrants of protections they had
come to rely on.
[to top of second column]
|
Protestors demonstrate against the termination of the Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program outside the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, U.S. May 15, 2018.
REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
Outside the Pasadena courthouse on Tuesday, some 30 DACA supporters
gathered in a rose garden, shouting slogans in Spanish and English.
Ali Torabi, 27, a DACA recipient who came from Iran with his mother
and younger brother 23 years ago, said he is hoping for a favorable
decision from the courts since Congress seems unable to act.
"Both parties are playing a lot of politics with our lives," Torabi
said. "They've let us down so many times."
The panel of judges, all appointed by Democratic presidents, could
issue its decision at any time. The Supreme Court, which in February
declined a request to weigh in before the appellate court, said at
the time it assumed the appeals court would rule swiftly.
(Reporting by Mica Rosenberg in New York and Lucy Nicholson in
Pasadena; Editing by Sue Horton)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|