From Burkina to Zimbabwe, U.S. aid cuts
squeeze family planning services
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2018]
By Tim Cocks
OUAGADOUGOU (Reuters) - The Marie Stopes
Ladies who drive from village to village in the remote north of Burkina
Faso offering free contraception, advice on family planning, sexual
health and sometimes abortion, may have to stop work in June.
The ten have been entirely funded by a $1.25 million grant from USAID
but the U.S. development agency cut all money for Marie Stopes
International when it refused to comply with a rule reinstated by
Republican President Donald Trump in January 2017.
It bans funding to any foreign NGO carrying out or offering advice on
abortions anywhere. The goal is to please Christian conservatives who
strongly oppose abortion and are a major part of Trump's political base.
MSI and the International Planned Parenthood Federation are among only
four to reject the conditions of the order. They offer abortion
services, in accordance with local rules, and say it is a last resort in
preventing unwanted or unsafe births.
USAID says 733 other NGOS still receive funding. But in Africa, MSI and
IPPF are the two largest NGO providers of free contraception and family
planning advice.
The NGOs say the contraceptive programs are crucial in Burkina, where
the fertility rate is 5.5 births per woman.
In some villages the MS Ladies operate from government centers,
supplementing the limited services on offer. The same grant also pays
for training for health workers in 80 government clinics.
MSI says the cuts mean programs affecting thousands of people in Burkina
Faso are under threat.
"All those women who've been receiving free contraception will have to
stop using it because they can't afford it," said Georges Coulibaly,
Marie Stopes' Burkina Faso manager told Reuters in the capital
Ouagadougou.
The U.S. policy says foreign NGOs must certify that they will not
"perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in
foreign countries or provide financial support to any other foreign ...
(NGO) that conducts such activities," as a pre-condition for getting
global family planning aid from the U.S. government.
This is the case even if the abortion care or advice itself is being
funded by other donors.
The rule was first introduced by Republican President Ronald Regan in
1984. Republican presidents since have signed it, while Democrat
presidents disagreed with the policy and reversed it.
This means funding for such NGOs has been volatile -- the policy has
been in force for 17 of the last 35 years.
A spokesman for USAID and an official for the State Department declined
to say how much money the United States now provides for global family
planning programs.
In 2015 when Democrat Barack Obama was president, it was $638 million.
MSI received around $30 million a year, around 9 percent of its total
funding, before the cut.
SEEKING OTHER DONORS
MSI say the cuts forced it to ax a voucher program in Madagascar and 22
out of 62 outreach teams there. In Uganda, 17 out of 35 teams are gone.
And in Zimbabwe, where MSI has an extensive presence, it has shut down
half of the 1200 teams it had going from village to village.
IPPF has shut 22 programs in sub-Saharan Africa and has others closing
this month in Togo, Ethiopia and Ivory Coast. This is because it has
lost USAID funding, Caroline Kwamboka, IPPF's senior advocacy manager
for Africa said.
The USAID money for the MS Ladies in northern Burkina was due to run out
in April but UK development agency, UK Aid, stepped in to keep it afloat
until June.
[to top of second column]
|
Women attend a family planning course given by a nurse from the NGO
Marie Stopes at a dispensary in the village of Nedgo, near
Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso February 16, 2018. Picture taken February
16, 2018. REUTERS/Luc Gnago
Coulibaly is hoping other donors will fill the gap to keep the
project open. They include the Hewlett-Foundation, the Waterloo
Foundation, the United Nation Population Fund (UNFPA) and the Gates
Foundation.
IPPF operations are not under threat in Burkina Faso as other donors
finance its projects there.
Attitudes toward contraception in Burkina Faso are mixed. Some
religious leaders say it is immoral and abortion is illegal except
for cases of rape or where the mother or baby is at risk.
But as in other West African countries government campaigns to
persuade them to space births out for the sake of maternal health
have been effective in recent years.
In 2011, West African governments signed up to the Ouagadougou
Partnership to try to reach an extra 2 million contraceptive users
by 2020.
SCRAMBLING FOR FUNDS
With their funding under threat, NGOs and others are looking for
ways to keep their coffers full.
In February Trump singled out the UNFPA, the single largest provider
of free contraception in Africa, for a funding ban, on grounds of
complicity in forced abortions in China. The UN agency denies this.
"The American people do not want to be complicit in killing unborn
children in the United States, in Africa or anywhere else," said
Republican Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey told Reuters by
phone.
In 2015 the agency received $32 million in U.S. funding. But other
country donors were so alarmed by Trump's cut that they covered the
shortfall and increased the budget in 2017, said UNFPA's West and
Central Africa director Mabingue Ngom.
"There was a positive impact from the (U.S.) cuts to our funding,"
he said. "It ended up bringing us more resources."
NGOs rely on a more varied mix of funding so closing the gap is
harder.
An official for the U.S. State Department, which is responsible for
USAID, said if an NGO loses its funding, it tries to help shift
operations to other NGOS.
"When an NGO has declined to agree to the policy, affected
departments and agencies work to transition the activities .... to
other partners," the official said.
MSI and IPPF are taking steps to shift away from U.S. funds.
"We made a conscious decision to ensure that more (recipient)
countries had more funders. This meant ... designing our proposals
to include more country profiles that matched our donors'
priorities," MSI spokesman Will Haris said.
The fluctuating funding has also been a wake up call for African
leaders who promised in 2015 to boost healthcare to 15 percent of
government spending. Most are behind target.
"Commitments have been made, but the money has not been
forthcoming," IPPF's Kwamboka said. "This reliance on aid from other
countries...it cannot go on."
(Additional reporting by Thiam Niaga in Nedgo and Lesley Wroughton
in Washington; editing by Anna Willard)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|