U.S. judge declines to dismiss ex-Trump
aide's false statement charges
Send a link to a friend
[May 26, 2018]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President
Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, lost a bid on
Friday to have certain criminal charges filed against him by Special
Counsel Robert Mueller dismissed.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who is presiding over Manafort's
case in Washington, said in a ruling that she will not dismiss one of
the charges against Manafort related to false statements concerning
whether he was required to register as a foreign agent for Ukraine's
then pro-Russia government.
However, she said the arguments his attorneys made regarding dismissing
one of the charges can be re-examined after his criminal trial later
this year.
A spokesman for Manafort declined to comment on the ruling.
Jackson's ruling marks yet another setback for Manafort.
Earlier this month, the same judge refused to dismiss the entire
indictment after Manafort's lawyers argued unsuccessfully that Mueller
had overstepped his prosecutorial powers.
Manafort is facing two indictments, this one in Washington and another
in Virginia, which both arose from Mueller’s investigation into
potential collusion between Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and
Russia.
Manafort is the most senior member of Trump’s campaign to be indicted,
though the charges do not relate to campaign activities.
In both cases, Manafort's lawyers claimed that the indictments should be
dismissed on the grounds that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
violated Justice Department rules when he tapped Mueller in May 2017 and
gave him too much power.
Manafort's lawyers also filed more targeted requests to dismiss certain
charges in the Washington case on more technical legal grounds.
[to top of second column]
|
President Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort (R) and his
attorney Kevin Downing arrive for a motions hearing regarding
evidence in his case at U.S. District Court in Washington, U.S., May
23, 2018. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
They argued that Jackson should dismiss one of two charges against
him related to false statements because they target the same
underlying offense and are therefore "multiplicitous" and violate
the Double Jeopardy clause of the U.S. Constitution.
That clause prohibits charging a person twice for the same offense.
One of the charges in the indictment relates to making false
statements, and the other alleges he violated the Foreign Agents
Registration Act when he filed false documents with the Justice
Department.
Jackson said that in prior cases it was found that it is possible to
violate one of these laws without violating the other and they are
not necessarily redundant charges.
She added that, in light of these circumstances, it would be better
to "defer this determination until after the trial."
She has yet to rule on a third request by Manafort to dismiss a
money laundering charge.
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; editing by Grant McCool and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|