"For women, targeted prenatal educational support programs may help
reduce unnecessary caesarean section, and this supports the notion
that women benefit from having adequate information to make an
informed choice," lead author Dr. Innie Chen from the University of
Ottawa in Canada told Reuters Health.
"Ongoing communication with the healthcare provider regarding the
options available for vaginal birth is an important component," she
added.
While C-section delivery can reduce complications associated with
childbirth and can be lifesaving for both the mother and the baby in
certain circumstances, there is no evidence that it benefits women
or babies when the procedure is not required.
Moreover, like any surgery, C-section can be associated with
significant risks to the health of the woman and baby, as well as to
future pregnancies.
Most national expert societies recommend vaginal delivery in the
absence of maternal or fetal reasons for delivering by cesarean. Yet
C-section rates are increasing globally and are well above the 10
percent to 15 percent rate the World Health Organization has
estimated to be sufficient to minimize maternal and newborn deaths,
the authors write in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
The study team reviewed 29 medical studies of interventions, such as
training or counseling programs, that either targeted pregnant
couples or their physicians in efforts to reduce unnecessary
C-section rates. Chen and her colleagues analyzed both the quality
of each study's evidence and whether it showed the intervention
works.
Among the interventions targeting pregnant women or couples,
childbirth training workshops seem to reduce C-section rates
significantly and increase spontaneous vaginal birth rates.
Nurse-led relaxation training programs and psychosocial couple-based
prevention programs also seem to reduce C-section rates. The quality
of the evidence for training was poor, however, and neither study
looked at whether these interventions affected maternal or newborn
complications or deaths, Chen's team notes.
There was high-quality evidence for interventions aimed at doctors,
such as clinical practice guidelines along with mandatory second
opinions, especially when combined with audits and feedback, the
researchers found. Physician education by local opinion leaders also
seems to be effective in reducing unnecessary C-sections, although
none of the doctor-targeted interventions made sizeable differences
in C-section rates and there was little difference in deaths or
complications.
[to top of second column] |
As for targeting healthcare organizations or hospitals, studies
found that combining midwifery with in-hospital labor and delivery
coverage by the obstetrician seems to reduce C-section rates,
compared with a private practice model of care. However, the
evidence quality was low and did not look at mortality or
complications.
Surprisingly, interventions that don't appear to be effective
outnumber those that do.
Prenatal education, education in breathing and relaxation
techniques, pelvic floor muscle training exercises with (versus
without) telephone follow-up, group therapy and education of public
health nurses on childbirth classes, among other interventions, have
little or no impact on C-section rates, the review found.
"We are very uncertain as to the effect of other interventions
identified on caesarean section rates as the certainty of the
evidence is very low," the researchers conclude.
"While caesarean section can be lifesaving for both mother and baby,
caesarean section rates vary widely worldwide and are rising
globally," Chen said in an email. "Many caesarean sections may be
unnecessary, and the reasons are complex, including both clinical
and non-clinical considerations."
"Women, healthcare providers, healthcare systems and societies need
to work together to decrease the number of unnecessary caesarean
sections within their institutions, regions, countries, and
globally," she added.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2DhO7Bu Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, online September 28, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |