U.S. judge shreds main claim in Parmesan
cheese labeling lawsuits
Send a link to a friend
[November 02, 2018]
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday
dismissed the central claim in lawsuits accusing five food producers and
retailers of deceiving consumers by using "100% Grated Parmesan Cheese"
labels to describe products that contained cellulose, an anti-clumping
agent made from wood pulp.
U.S. District Judge Gary Feinerman in Chicago found a lack of proof that
the labels would mislead reasonable consumers into thinking the products
were 100 percent cheese, despite evidence that two linguistics
professors and the "vast majority" consumers in a recent survey thought
so.
The judge allowed some state consumer protection claims against
Albertsons Cos, Kraft Heinz Co and Walmart Inc over ingredient lists
that said cellulose was used to prevent "caking," when it was also used
as filler.
He dismissed all claims against two other retailers, Publix Super
Markets Inc and Target Corp.
The plaintiffs in the proposed class actions said that they overpaid for
what they thought was 100 percent cheese, and sought a variety of
damages.
Their lawyer, Ben Barnow, declined to comment because the litigation was
still pending, according to his office.
Kraft Heinz, in a statement, said it was pleased the judge found
reasonable consumers would not be confused "when the ingredient line
clearly lists cellulose powder," and said it will defend against the
rest of its lawsuit.
The other defendants had no immediate comment or did not immediately
respond to requests for comment.
Feinerman had dismissed the lawsuits in August 2017, but let the
plaintiffs amend their cases.
[to top of second column]
|
Wheels of parmesan are stored on shelves to mature at a dairy plant
in Litovel, one of the world's biggest producer of traditionally
made parmesan cheese, June 27, 2012. REUTERS/Petr Josek
In his earlier ruling, he had said "100% Grated Parmesan Cheese" was
ambiguous, because it could mean a product contained 100 percent
cheese, or that 100 percent of the cheese was parmesan, or that the
parmesan was 100 percent grated.
The new evidence did not change his view.
Feinerman called the survey "valueless," in part because it showed
that some consumers did not believe the products were 100 percent
cheese.
He also said reasonable consumers did not "approach or interpret
language in the manner of a linguistics professor."
Some 50 lawsuits had been filed in the litigation, which began in
early 2016, before being consolidated.
The case is In re: 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Marketing and Sales
Practices Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of
Illinois, No. 16-05802.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|