| 
						Forget gridlock, Republican win may be better for stocks
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 03, 2018] 
		 By Noel Randewich 
 SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - U.S. President 
		Donald Trump has warned that his favorite measure of success, the stock 
		market, is imperiled if voters favor Democrats in next week's 
		congressional elections.
 
 While not fully accurate - stocks tend to rise regardless of who 
		controls the government - it does bear out that the market has delivered 
		a slightly stronger performance on average when Republicans dominate in 
		Washington.
 
 A Reuters analysis of the past half century shows stocks fared better in 
		the two calendar years after congressional elections when Republicans 
		control Congress and the presidency than when Democrats controlled the 
		two branches, and at least as well as during times of gridlock. Many 
		investors are now hoping for a continuation of the Republican agenda.
 
		 
		
 "There is Trump 'the person', who is very controversial," said Stephen 
		Massocca, Senior Vice President at Wedbush Securities in San Francisco. 
		"And there's also Trump 'the agenda'. The Trump agenda, the stock market 
		loves. To the extent it continues, the market will like that."
 
 Republicans traditionally push pro-business policies such as tax cuts 
		and deregulation, which boost stock prices. The market has, on the 
		whole, given Trump a thumbs-up, with the market rising almost 20 percent 
		during his presidency so far.
 
 Polls show strong chances that the Democratic Party may win control of 
		the House of Representatives in the Nov. 6 midterm elections after two 
		years of wielding no practical political power in Washington, with 
		Republicans likely to keep the Senate.
 
 Trump warned in a tweet on Tuesday that a change in Congress would be 
		bad for the market, saying: "If you want your Stocks to go down, I 
		strongly suggest voting Democrat."
 
 Investors often favor Washington gridlock because it preserves the 
		status quo and reduces uncertainty.
 
 "Traditionally, gridlock is good for the markets. But I think this 
		election is very tricky; I'm not sure that's the preferred market 
		outcome because a lot of the benefits of the past two years have come 
		from not being in a gridlock environment," said Mike O'Rourke, Chief 
		Market Strategist at JonesTrading.
 
 Should his fellow Republicans maintain or extend their grip on Congress, 
		Trump may be emboldened to pursue more of his political agenda, 
		including further tax overhauls.
 
 By contrast, Democratic gains that allow the party to control the House 
		of Representatives, and possibly the Senate, could stifle Trump's policy 
		aims and perhaps lead to attempts to impeach him. It could also lead to 
		resistance to increasing the government's debt limit next year.
 
 "Our economists believe that two likely consequences of a divided 
		Congress would be an increase in investigations and uncertainty 
		surrounding fiscal deadlines, which could raise equity volatility," 
		Goldman Sachs said in a report this week.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in 
			New York, U.S., November 1, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid 
            
			 
Over the past 50 years, gridlock has been the norm rather than the exception in 
Washington, with the presidency and Congress won by one party in just seven out 
of 25 congressional election years.
 GRAPHIC: Wall Street and Washington - https://tmsnrt.rs/2P57hRu
 
 Looking at the two calendar years following each congressional election, the S&P 
500 had a mean annual increase of 12 percent under Republican-controlled 
governments, compared to an increase of 9 percent for Democrat-controlled 
governments and a 7 percent rise for gridlocked governments.
 
 However, using median averages, which exclude outliers, differences are less 
clear, with the S&P 500 seeing annual increases of 11 percent under 
Republican-controlled governments and under gridlock, and 10 percent gains under 
Democrat-controlled governments.
 
 An analysis by BTIG brokerage of data going back to 1928 also indicates gridlock 
is not necessarily ideal. It showed U.S. stocks performing better under united 
governments.
 
 "While government control is by no means the sole determinant of market 
performance, investors clearly favor a unified regime," BTIG strategist Julian 
Emanuel wrote in his report.
 
 Interest rates, economic growth, company earnings and inflation are widely 
viewed as strong influences on stock prices, making the balance of power in 
Washington just one of many factors affecting investor sentiment.
 
 
 
Two Democratic presidents - Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - have presided over 
the strongest S&P 500 performances http://tmsnrt.rs/2jtEpzi since 1952, with 
gains of 208 percent and 166 percent, respectively.
 
 Wall Street has applauded Trump since he took power in January 2017 and quickly 
pushed through measures to deregulate banks and other companies. Last December, 
his Republican party passed sweeping corporate tax cuts that have S&P 500 
companies on track this year to grow their earnings per share by over 20 
percent, the biggest jump since 2010, according to Refinitiv IBES data.
 
 "Volatility may rise regardless of the outcome, but, based on historical 
relationships, equities may be more likely to rise if Republicans manage to 
maintain control of Congress," Deutsche Bank said in a recent report.
 
 (Reporting by Noel Randewich; Editing by James Dalgleish)
 
				 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |