| 
		U.S. top court takes up religious dispute 
		over Maryland cross 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 03, 2018] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme 
		Court on Friday waded into a new fight over the separation of church and 
		state, agreeing to decide whether a towering cross-shaped war memorial 
		erected in 1925 on public land in Maryland violates the Constitution's 
		ban on government endorsement of religion.
 
 The justices agreed to hear two separate appeals of a lower court's 
		ruling that the memorial violated the Constitution's First Amendment 
		prohibition on the government favoring one religion, saying the memorial 
		- dubbed the "peace cross" - is inherently religious due to its shape 
		like a Christian cross.
 
 The high court will take up appeals brought by a public agency called 
		the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, which owns 
		the cross, and the American Legion, a private veterans organization that 
		holds memorial events at the site. The legion is represented by the 
		First Liberty Institute, a conservative religious rights group.
 
 The 40-foot-tall (12 meters) cross, located at a busy intersection just 
		outside Washington, was completed in 1925 to honor 49 members of the 
		U.S. armed forces from Maryland's Prince George's County who died in 
		World War One.
 
		
		 
		
 "For nearly 100 years the memorial has stood to honor these 49 sons of 
		Prince George's County who made the ultimate sacrifice for their 
		country. The Supreme Court should not allow their memory to be 
		bulldozed," said Michael Carvin, a lawyer for the American Legion.
 
 The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2017 that 
		the cross was unconstitutional.
 
 "The monument here has the primary effect of endorsing religion and 
		excessively tangles the government in religion," Judge Stephanie Thacker 
		wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel that was split 2-1.
 
 The court ruled in favor of the American Humanist Association, a group 
		that calls itself "the leading progressive voice in America on behalf of 
		humanists, atheists, agnostics and freethinkers," as well as three local 
		residents. The challengers want the memorial to be removed or redesigned 
		so it no longer is shaped like a cross.
 
 The appeals court overturned a 2015 ruling by a judge in Maryland who 
		had decided there was no constitutional violation.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Police officers stand in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in 
			Washington, U.S., January 19, 2018. REUTERS/Eric Thayer/File Photo 
            
 
            'PROMOTING ONE RELIGION'
 Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a group that 
			advocates for keeping religion out of government, urged the court to 
			uphold the appeals court decision.
 
 "This immense Christian cross on public land clearly shows 
			government promoting one religion - Christianity - above all 
			others," said Rachel Laser, the group's president.
 
 Aside from its shape, the cross has no other religious themes or 
			imagery, according to lawyers for the commission and the American 
			Legion. At monument's base is a plaque that lists the names of the 
			dead. Every year, ceremonies with no religious content are held at 
			the site, lawyers defending the cross said.
 
 American Humanist Society lawyers have said the memorial has always 
			had specific associations with Christianity. Aside from the cross 
			shape, Christian clergy have been involved in events at the site 
			since it was dedicated, with virtually every one featuring 
			Christian-themed prayers, the lawyers said in court papers.
 
 The court has ruled in the past on what types of public displays 
			featuring religious content are permitted. In 2010, it ruled that a 
			cross on federal land in the Mojave National Preserve in California 
			could remain, upholding the government's decision to transfer the 
			land into private ownership.
 
            
			 
			The court in 2005 ruled that a monument on the grounds of the Texas 
			state capitol building that depicts the biblical Ten Commandments 
			did not violate the Constitution.
 A ruling in the Maryland case is due by the end of June.
 
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |