| 
				Under a proposal from the EU's executive Commission in March, EU 
				states would charge a 3 percent levy on the digital revenues of 
				large firms that are accused of averting tax by routing their 
				profits to the bloc's low-tax states.
 But the plan, which requires the support of all 28 EU states, is 
				opposed by a large number of them.
 
 The Commission's effort to come up with a system to ensure 
				internet companies pay adequate tax has been running in parallel 
				with a study of the subject by the Organisation for Economic 
				Cooperation and Development seeking a multi-lateral approach.
 
 "It is very difficult to see an agreement on the digital tax 
				because so many technical issues are not solved yet," Danish 
				Finance Minister, Kristian Jensen, told reporters on the 
				sidelines of a meeting of EU finance ministers.
 
 He added that the proposed EU tax was devised in a way that 
				would hit mostly U.S. companies and therefore it would attract 
				U.S. retaliation. "Of course there will be a reaction from the 
				U.S." he said, calling the tax "not a good idea for Europe".
 
 His remarks echoed comments made by diplomats from several EU 
				states, including Germany, Sweden, Ireland and Malta, in a 
				meeting last week, according to EU officials.
 
 France, which has long been the main supporter of the tax, 
				proposed in September a sunset clause, as a step to convince 
				reluctant states. It suggested on Tuesday that it could support 
				allowing more time to implement a new tax system, so that the 
				OECD can finish its analysis.
 
 "There must be the adoption of a directive on digital taxation 
				by the end of this year," Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said, 
				using the term for EU laws.
 
 "There will be the question of implementation of the directive. 
				We are open on that question, because we know there is work done 
				by the OECD," he said.
 
 EU states are discussing two options put on the table by the 
				European Commission. The most ambitious plan would entail a tax 
				on the turnover of digital firms imposed unilaterally by the EU 
				before a deal is reached at global level.
 
 This approach is opposed by several countries, including small 
				ones like Ireland where many tech firms book profits on sales in 
				bigger EU countries.
 
 The second option, which has so far been sidelined, would revise 
				the tax rules so that levies could be imposed on companies based 
				on their "digital presence" in a state. This option would take 
				longer to be applied and would be in line with work at OECD 
				level.
 
 "We hope we can have a unanimous decision that will go down the 
				OECD road," Jensen said.
 
 (Reporting by Francesco Guarascio; Editing by Peter Graff)
 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
				Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
				 |  |