Supreme Court rebuffs challenge to
California gun restrictions
Send a link to a friend
[November 06, 2018]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court for a second straight year refused on Monday to hear a challenge
to California's limits on carrying handguns in public, dealing another
setback to gun rights proponents.
The court's action underscored its continued reluctance to step into a
national debate over gun control roiled by a series of mass shootings
including the one at a Pittsburgh synagogue that killed 11 people on
Oct. 27. It has not taken up a major gun case since 2010.
The justices, declining to hear an appeal by two gun owners, on Monday
left in place a November 2017 ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals upholding California's restrictions.
California law generally bars people from carrying firearms outside the
home but local sheriffs can issue permits to carry a concealed gun in
public places if applicants show "good cause." It is left up to
individual sheriffs to determine what constitutes "good cause."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f9e3/2f9e344ab98cb723ef64ffdd18b39eb770e8c369" alt=""
The Supreme Court in June 2017 declined to hear a similar case
challenging California's policy toward carrying guns in public.
In the case acted upon on Monday, gun owners James Rothery and Andrea
Hoffman - who wanted to carry their weapons in public - sued the state
and Sacramento County in 2008, saying the process for granting permits
for carrying a concealed handgun was "arbitrary and capricious" and
violated their right to bear arms under the U.S. Constitution's Second
Amendment.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5049b/5049b376a1d674a1c310f611336755df77105967" alt=""
Surrendered handguns are seen during a gun buyback event at Los
Angeles Sports Arena in Los Angeles, California May 31, 2014.
REUTERS/Kevork Djansezian/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cc7c/0cc7c56280acd65420ffe5df7add00cb4e6a4bce" alt=""
They also said the law violated their 14th Amendment right to equal
protection under the law.
Like the case turned away by the Supreme Court last year, this one
was an appeal of a lower court decision upholding a local sheriff's
refusal to issue a permit.
In its landmark 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller ruling, the
Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment
guarantees an individual's right to bear arms for self-defense in
the home. In 2010, the court said that ruling applied nationwide.
The action Monday was the first on a gun rights issue since
conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, appointed by President Donald
Trump, joined the court last month. In his previous role as a judge
on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit,
Kavanaugh backed expansive gun rights.
The court did not disclose how individual justices voted in the
California case.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |