| 
		Supreme Court rebuffs challenge to 
		California gun restrictions 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 06, 2018] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme 
		Court for a second straight year refused on Monday to hear a challenge 
		to California's limits on carrying handguns in public, dealing another 
		setback to gun rights proponents.
 
 The court's action underscored its continued reluctance to step into a 
		national debate over gun control roiled by a series of mass shootings 
		including the one at a Pittsburgh synagogue that killed 11 people on 
		Oct. 27. It has not taken up a major gun case since 2010.
 
 The justices, declining to hear an appeal by two gun owners, on Monday 
		left in place a November 2017 ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. 
		Circuit Court of Appeals upholding California's restrictions.
 
 California law generally bars people from carrying firearms outside the 
		home but local sheriffs can issue permits to carry a concealed gun in 
		public places if applicants show "good cause." It is left up to 
		individual sheriffs to determine what constitutes "good cause."
 
		
		 
		The Supreme Court in June 2017 declined to hear a similar case 
		challenging California's policy toward carrying guns in public.
 In the case acted upon on Monday, gun owners James Rothery and Andrea 
		Hoffman - who wanted to carry their weapons in public - sued the state 
		and Sacramento County in 2008, saying the process for granting permits 
		for carrying a concealed handgun was "arbitrary and capricious" and 
		violated their right to bear arms under the U.S. Constitution's Second 
		Amendment.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Surrendered handguns are seen during a gun buyback event at Los 
			Angeles Sports Arena in Los Angeles, California May 31, 2014. 
			REUTERS/Kevork Djansezian/File Photo 
            
 
            They also said the law violated their 14th Amendment right to equal 
			protection under the law.
 Like the case turned away by the Supreme Court last year, this one 
			was an appeal of a lower court decision upholding a local sheriff's 
			refusal to issue a permit.
 
 In its landmark 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller ruling, the 
			Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment 
			guarantees an individual's right to bear arms for self-defense in 
			the home. In 2010, the court said that ruling applied nationwide.
 
 The action Monday was the first on a gun rights issue since 
			conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, appointed by President Donald 
			Trump, joined the court last month. In his previous role as a judge 
			on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 
			Kavanaugh backed expansive gun rights.
 
 The court did not disclose how individual justices voted in the 
			California case.
 
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |