| 
			
			 While close personal touch and meaningful social interactions with 
			other people have long been linked to better physical and mental 
			health, much of this research has focused on romantic or family 
			relationships, researchers note in the online journal PLOS ONE. 
 The current study focused on adults who were typically not married 
			or in long-term committed relationships, and still found a link 
			between simple touch - hugs - and better moods after people 
			experienced conflict.
 
 For the study, researchers interviewed 404 men and women every night 
			for two weeks about a wide range of activities and interactions they 
			had experienced during the day as well as any positive or negative 
			moods. Just 98 of the participants were married or in what they 
			described as "marriage-like" relationships.
 
 
			
			 
			When people experienced conflicts, they noted a smaller decrease in 
			positive emotions and a smaller increase in negative feelings when 
			they had also received one or more hugs that day, the study found.
 
 "We were not surprised to find that people who reported receiving a 
			hug appeared to be protected against poorer moods related to 
			experiencing conflict," said lead study author Michael Murphy of 
			Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
 
 "This finding is consistent with multiple emerging lines of evidence 
			demonstrating the ability of touch-behaviors within close 
			relationships to reduce perceptions of threat and increase feelings 
			of security and wellbeing," Murphy said by email. "We were, however, 
			at least somewhat surprised to find that there were no detectable 
			differences between women and men in our study in the extent to 
			which hugs protected against conflict-related negative mood."
 
 Overall, participants reported experiencing conflicts on an average 
			of two days during the study; they reported receiving hugs, on 
			average, on almost nine days.
 
 On any given day, about 10 percent of participants experienced 
			conflict and also received a hug, the study found. About 4 percent 
			of participants on any given day experienced conflict but didn't get 
			a hug.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			Marital status didn't appear to influence the connection between 
			hugs and mood. Neither did the amount of social support people 
			perceived in relationships with others.
 Although the connection between hugs and mood also looked similar 
			for men and women, women did report more days of conflict and more 
			days of hugs than men.
 
 The study wasn't a controlled experiment designed to prove whether 
			or how hugs might directly impact mood.
 
			However, social interaction and touch have long been linked to 
			changes in the brain that can have a positive impact on physical and 
			mental health, noted Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for 
			Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia University in New 
			York City.
 "There are multiple plausible mechanisms that may help explain the 
			observed benefits of hugs in reducing conflict-related negative 
			moods, including perceptual, psychological and neurobiological 
			pathways," Li, who wasn't involved in the study, said by email.
 
 "It is well known that social interaction and engagement is 
			essential to the long-term survival of all social animals from ants 
			to chimpanzees and is beneficial to mental and physical health for 
			children and older adults," Li said.
 
 "For infants, gentle and kind personal touch, dubbed as 'kangaroo 
			care' is found to have strong therapeutic effects and facilitate 
			positive neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes," Li added. 
			"This study indicates that the health benefits of social interaction 
			and engagement, in the form of hugs, also apply to young and 
			middle-aged adults."
 
 SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2E24nrD PLOS ONE, online October 3, 2018.
 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			 |