| 
		Trump administration moves to curb 
		migrants' asylum claims 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 09, 2018] 
		By Yeganeh Torbati and Kristina Cooke 
 WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The 
		Trump administration unveiled new rules on Thursday to sharply limit 
		migrant asylum claims by barring individuals who cross the U.S. southern 
		border illegally from seeking asylum.
 
 Immigrant advocates denounced the move, saying it violated existing U.S. 
		law that allows people fleeing persecution and violence in their home 
		countries to apply for asylum regardless of whether they enter illegally 
		or not.
 
 The regulations released on Thursday, in conjunction with an order 
		expected to be signed by President Donald Trump, would effectively ban 
		migrants who cross the U.S. border with Mexico illegally from qualifying 
		for asylum.
 
 Once the plan goes into full effect, migrants entering at the U.S. 
		southern border would only be eligible for asylum if they report at 
		official ports of entry, officials said.
 
 "What we are attempting to do is trying to funnel ... asylum claims 
		through the ports of entry where we are better resourced, have better 
		capabilities and better manpower and staffing to actually handle those 
		claims in an expeditious and efficient manner," a senior administration 
		official told reporters in a news briefing on Thursday, on condition of 
		anonymity.
 
 The Trump administration has already made it more difficult for migrants 
		to qualify for asylum in the United States. Administration officials 
		have said existing U.S. asylum rules encourage illegal immigration and 
		bog down legitimate claims.
 
 
		
		 
		In June, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued an appellate 
		decision that sharply narrowed the circumstances under which immigrants 
		can use violence at home as grounds for U.S. asylum.
 
 Sessions, who resigned at Trump's request this week, also instructed 
		immigration judges and asylum officers to view illegal border-crossing 
		as a "serious adverse factor" in deciding a case and to consider whether 
		applicants could have escaped danger by relocating within their own 
		countries.
 
 Trump made his hard-line policies toward immigration a key issue ahead 
		of Tuesday's midterm elections, sending thousands of U.S. troops to help 
		secure the southern border and repeatedly drawing attention to a caravan 
		of Central American migrants trekking through Mexico toward the United 
		States.
 
		Currently, U.S. asylum rules do not bar people who enter the country 
		without authorization, and the Immigration and Nationality Act, which 
		governs the U.S. immigration system, specifically allows people who 
		arrive in the United States, whether or not they do so at a designated 
		port of entry, to apply for asylum.
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			A group of Central Americans who are hoping to apply for asylum, 
			wait at the border on an international bridge between Mexico and the 
			U.S. in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico October 31, 2018. REUTERS/Jose Luis 
			Gonzalez/File Photo 
            
			 
            The administration's plan, which invokes the same authority Trump 
			used to justify his travel ban on citizens of several 
			Muslim-majority nations, is likely to be quickly challenged in 
			court.
 The move would largely affect migrants from Central America's 
			Northern Triangle - Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador - who cross 
			the U.S. border with Mexico to flee violence and poverty in their 
			home countries.
 
 "The vast majority of aliens who enter illegally today come from the 
			Northern Triangle countries," the regulation's text says. 
			"Channeling those aliens to ports of entry would encourage these 
			aliens to first avail themselves of offers of asylum from Mexico."
 
 Immigrant advocates denounced the administration's move as unlawful, 
			and said the plan to funnel migrants to ports of entry was just a 
			way to cut asylum claims overall.
 
 "Congress has directly spoken to this question as to whether 
			individuals can be rendered ineligible for asylum if they cross 
			between ports of entry and has specifically said people are eligible 
			regardless of where they cross," said Lee Gelernt, an attorney with 
			the American Civil Liberties Union.
 
 "Ports of entry ... are overcrowded," said Jonathan Ryan, executive 
			director of RAICES, a Texas-based immigrant defense group. 
			"Asylum-seekers have been left to camp out for days and weeks on 
			bridges at the border, when they should be guaranteed a right to 
			enter the country for a fair hearing."
 
 (Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati and Kristina Cooke; editing by Peter 
			Cooney and Tom Brown)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |