Trump administration moves to curb
migrants' asylum claims
Send a link to a friend
[November 09, 2018]
By Yeganeh Torbati and Kristina Cooke
WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The
Trump administration unveiled new rules on Thursday to sharply limit
migrant asylum claims by barring individuals who cross the U.S. southern
border illegally from seeking asylum.
Immigrant advocates denounced the move, saying it violated existing U.S.
law that allows people fleeing persecution and violence in their home
countries to apply for asylum regardless of whether they enter illegally
or not.
The regulations released on Thursday, in conjunction with an order
expected to be signed by President Donald Trump, would effectively ban
migrants who cross the U.S. border with Mexico illegally from qualifying
for asylum.
Once the plan goes into full effect, migrants entering at the U.S.
southern border would only be eligible for asylum if they report at
official ports of entry, officials said.
"What we are attempting to do is trying to funnel ... asylum claims
through the ports of entry where we are better resourced, have better
capabilities and better manpower and staffing to actually handle those
claims in an expeditious and efficient manner," a senior administration
official told reporters in a news briefing on Thursday, on condition of
anonymity.
The Trump administration has already made it more difficult for migrants
to qualify for asylum in the United States. Administration officials
have said existing U.S. asylum rules encourage illegal immigration and
bog down legitimate claims.
In June, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued an appellate
decision that sharply narrowed the circumstances under which immigrants
can use violence at home as grounds for U.S. asylum.
Sessions, who resigned at Trump's request this week, also instructed
immigration judges and asylum officers to view illegal border-crossing
as a "serious adverse factor" in deciding a case and to consider whether
applicants could have escaped danger by relocating within their own
countries.
Trump made his hard-line policies toward immigration a key issue ahead
of Tuesday's midterm elections, sending thousands of U.S. troops to help
secure the southern border and repeatedly drawing attention to a caravan
of Central American migrants trekking through Mexico toward the United
States.
Currently, U.S. asylum rules do not bar people who enter the country
without authorization, and the Immigration and Nationality Act, which
governs the U.S. immigration system, specifically allows people who
arrive in the United States, whether or not they do so at a designated
port of entry, to apply for asylum.
[to top of second column]
|
A group of Central Americans who are hoping to apply for asylum,
wait at the border on an international bridge between Mexico and the
U.S. in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico October 31, 2018. REUTERS/Jose Luis
Gonzalez/File Photo
The administration's plan, which invokes the same authority Trump
used to justify his travel ban on citizens of several
Muslim-majority nations, is likely to be quickly challenged in
court.
The move would largely affect migrants from Central America's
Northern Triangle - Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador - who cross
the U.S. border with Mexico to flee violence and poverty in their
home countries.
"The vast majority of aliens who enter illegally today come from the
Northern Triangle countries," the regulation's text says.
"Channeling those aliens to ports of entry would encourage these
aliens to first avail themselves of offers of asylum from Mexico."
Immigrant advocates denounced the administration's move as unlawful,
and said the plan to funnel migrants to ports of entry was just a
way to cut asylum claims overall.
"Congress has directly spoken to this question as to whether
individuals can be rendered ineligible for asylum if they cross
between ports of entry and has specifically said people are eligible
regardless of where they cross," said Lee Gelernt, an attorney with
the American Civil Liberties Union.
"Ports of entry ... are overcrowded," said Jonathan Ryan, executive
director of RAICES, a Texas-based immigrant defense group.
"Asylum-seekers have been left to camp out for days and weeks on
bridges at the border, when they should be guaranteed a right to
enter the country for a fair hearing."
(Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati and Kristina Cooke; editing by Peter
Cooney and Tom Brown)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|