| 
			
			 People with diabetes are at risk for life-threatening blood vessel 
			diseases. Left untreated, these conditions can lead to complications 
			such as heart attack, stroke and amputation. 
 For the study, researchers examined data on almost 34,000 people 
			with diabetes who initially had employer-sponsored health plans with 
			deductibles of $500 or less - but then their employers switched to 
			offering only plans with deductibles of $1,000 or more. The study 
			team also looked at a comparison group of almost 295,000 workers 
			with diabetes who consistently had deductibles of $500 or less.
 
 Before the first group switched to higher deductible health plans, 
			there were no meaningful differences between the groups in how long 
			patients waited to get care for complications that can be 
			life-threatening without timely treatment, the study found.
 
 
			
			 
			But over the four years after some employers switched to offering 
			only high-deductible plans, the patients on these plans waited an 
			average of 1.5 months longer than people on low-deductible plans to 
			seek care for new symptoms of cardiovascular complications 
			associated with diabetes, 1.9 months longer for diagnostic tests and 
			3.1 months longer for medical procedures to treat these 
			complications.
 
 "We found that delays or reductions in care for cardiovascular 
			disease persisted over a relatively long follow-up and occurred even 
			for services that are used for life-threatening conditions," said 
			study leader Dr. Frank Wharam of Harvard Medical School and Harvard 
			Pilgrim Health Care Institute in Boston.
 
 An increasing proportion of Americans, including people with 
			diabetes, have high-deductible health insurance plans requiring them 
			to pay up to about $1,000 to $7,000 out-of-pocket per year if they 
			use healthcare services, researchers note in the Annals of Internal 
			Medicine. But studies to date haven't offered a clear picture of how 
			this added cost might impact healthcare utilization for people with 
			diabetes.
 
 The study can't prove whether or how costs might have influenced how 
			long patients waited to get any needed exams, lab tests or 
			treatments.
 
 But it's likely that money played a role because everyone in the 
			study had diabetes with similar risks of cardiovascular 
			complications, Wharam said by email.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			"We can speculate that diabetes patients' knowledge of the high cost 
			of care, and a desire to save money, led to these patterns," Wharam 
			said.
 All of the patients in the study had employer-sponsored health 
			insurance provided by a single large health insurance company in the 
			U.S. between 2003 and 2012, and their employers did not offer more 
			than one option for insurance in any given year.
 
			People who switched to high-deductible plans were 6 percent less 
			likely to seek care for the first new major symptom of complications 
			during the study, such as chest or leg pain. They were also 9 
			percent less likely to get the first diagnostic test they needed and 
			9 percent less likely to get procedures to treat these 
			complications.
 Compared to the people who remained in low-deductible plans 
			throughout the study, those who switched to higher-deductible plans 
			had their out-of-pocket health costs increase by an average of 43 
			percent to 53 percent per year.
 
 The research team couldn't verify why patients may have chosen to 
			wait for needed care, making it impossible to prove that increased 
			costs were partially or completely responsible, the authors note.
 
 "I am not aware of any rigorous studies that ask about motives and 
			thought processes, but the economic model would suggest that a 
			person who would have to pay more would delay care for mild symptoms 
			that might resolve on their own," said Mark Pauly of the Wharton 
			School and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of 
			Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
 
			
			 
			"Someone whose care is free because insurance covers it would be 
			more likely to seek care at the first sign of a symptom," Pauly, 
			author of an accompanying editorial, said by email.
 SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2qUsCyw and https://bit.ly/2Q6vTcf Annals of 
			Internal Medicine, online November 19, 2018.
 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |