Maryland prosecutors seek to reinstate
'Serial' murder conviction
Send a link to a friend
[November 29, 2018]
By Gabriella Borter
(Reuters) - Maryland prosecutors on
Thursday will try to persuade the state's top court to reinstate the
almost two-decade-old murder conviction of Adnan Syed, whose guilt was
called into doubt by the popular podcast "Serial."
Syed, who has been serving a life sentence since 2000, repeatedly tried
to appeal his conviction on charges of murdering his girlfriend Hae Min
Lee, before Chicago public radio station WBEZ's "Serial" uncovered new
alibi evidence in 2014.
A Baltimore judge in 2016 vacated Syed's conviction, saying that Syed's
former lawyer, M. Cristina Gutierrez, did not defend him effectively
when she failed to investigate a potential alibi witness. That ruling
would set the stage for a new trial, which has been delayed by appeals
by state prosecutors.
The state Court of Special Appeals upheld the lower court's decision
earlier this year.
The state appealed that ruling a second time on the grounds that the
lower court was wrong to find that Syed previously had an ineffective
defense counsel. Maryland's Court of Appeals, the state's highest
judicial body, agreed in July to hear the prosecutors' case for
reinstating Syed's conviction.
Syed, now 38, was accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee in
1999, when they were both students at Woodlawn High School in Baltimore.
Syed's case reentered the public eye as the subject of the podcast
"Serial," which has been downloaded tens of millions of times since its
2014 launch.
The podcast raised new evidence from potential witness Asia McClain,
whom Syed's former attorney did not interview. McClain said in an
affidavit that she saw Syed in the Woodlawn Public Library around the
time prosecutors said he strangled Lee.
[to top of second column]
|
Convicted murderer Adnan Syed arrives at the Baltimore City Circuit
Courthouse in Baltimore, Maryland February 5, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos
Barria -/File Photo
Syed's attorney, Justin Brown, also contends the jury that convicted
Syed was misinformed about the cellphone evidence provided by
prosecutors.
Prosecutors said that around the time Lee was thought to have been
murdered, AT&T data showed Syed's phone received incoming calls at
the location where her body was found. Brown said the jury was not
aware of an AT&T statement that incoming calls are not reliable
indicators of a cellphone's location.
Brown said in a phone interview that he was confident that Syed
would be found innocent if Maryland's top court allows a new trial
to go forward.
"We think, when put under the scrutiny of a new trial, the state's
case will fall apart," he said.
(Reporting by Gabriella Borter; Editing by Scott Malone and Steve
Orlofsky)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |