Kavanaugh does not belong on Supreme
Court, retired Justice Stevens says
Send a link to a friend
[October 05, 2018]
(Reuters) - Retired U.S. Supreme
Court Justice John Paul Stevens said on Thursday that Supreme Court
nominee Brett Kavanaugh does not belong on the high court because of
"potential bias" he showed in his recent Senate confirmation hearing.
Speaking to an audience of retirees in Boca Raton, Florida, Stevens, 98,
said he started out believing that Kavanaugh deserved to be confirmed,
"but his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind."
Stevens cited commentary by Harvard University law professor Laurence
Tribe and others suggesting Kavanaugh had raised doubts about his
political impartiality when he asserted that sexual misconduct
accusations he faced stemmed from an "orchestrated political hit" funded
by left-wing groups seeking "revenge on behalf of the Clintons."
Kavanaugh had spent more than three years working for Ken Starr, the
independent counsel who investigated Democratic President Bill Clinton
in the 1990s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0efd6/0efd6fc9f342f3e009282d45b6e0589133d88a10" alt=""
Kavanaugh also testified last week that allegations against him were
being fueled by "pent-up anger" over the 2016 election of President
Donald Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh to fill the Supreme Court vacancy
created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Thursday, Kavanaugh said he "might
have been too emotional at times" in his testimony. Kavanaugh wrote that
his testimony "reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly
accused."
Some critics have argued that Kavanaugh's highly partisan remarks so
compromised his ability to appear politically fair-minded that he would
be forced to recuse himself on many cases to preserve the court's
integrity.
Stevens said he, too, has come to believe that Kavanaugh, a U.S.
appellate judge, "demonstrated a potential bias involving enough
potential litigants before the (high) court that he would not be able to
perform his full responsibilities."
"I think there's merit in that criticism, and that the senators should
really pay attention to it for the good of the court. It's not healthy
to get a new justice who can only do a part-time job," Stevens said.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b74/93b746aedabd7914d9673ce086d2bd8066bd3fd1" alt=""
Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens departs the
funeral of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia at
the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in
Washington, February 20, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aef91/aef91ce0b034a96f7f9e6bcdd64e20023f2be880" alt=""
Stevens, a lifelong Republican and appointee of President Gerald
Ford who ended up as a generally liberal voice on the court by the
time he retired in 2010, spoke at an event hosted by a Palm Beach
Post reporter. Video of his remarks was shown by the C-SPAN
television network.
Stevens acknowledged praising Kavanaugh and one of his rulings on
foreign campaign contributions in his 2014 book "Six Amendments: How
and Why We Should Change the Constitution."
Stevens went on to say that his change of heart on Kavanaugh's
fitness for the high court was "for reasons that have really no
relationship to his intellectual ability or his record as a federal
judge. He's a fine federal judge."
Asked whether questions raised about Kavanaugh's credibility during
the hearings should be disqualifying, Stevens said, "Not
necessarily."
Stevens also said political leaders and the court have failed to
repair the nation's confidence in the judicial branch's separation
from the president and the legislature.
"I think it's worse, I regret to say it," he said.
The U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation on
Friday.
An FBI report to the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded an
investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against
Kavanaugh by California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford
and former Yale classmate Deborah Ramirez.
(Reporting by Bill Tarrant and Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing
by Bill Berkrot and Leslie Adler)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |