Less
running, less possession paid off for France at World Cup
Send a link to a friend
[October 16, 2018]
By Brian Homewood
ZURICH, Oct 16 (Reuters) - France let
their opponents do the hard work on their way to winning the World
Cup, running less than most teams and enjoying less than 50 percent
possession throughout the tournament, a FIFA technical report showed
on Tuesday.
The report also showed that the French scored once in every six
shots on goal -- compared with once in 36 shots for Germany, who
were knocked out in the first round. The two sides meet in the UEFA
Nations League on Tuesday night.
As expected, the FIFA report showed that Spain enjoyed the most
possession at an average of 69 percent, but the style of play that
brought them great dividends from 2008 to 2012 proved their undoing
in Russia as they were knocked out in the second round.
France ranked a modest 19th out of the 32 teams in terms of
possession, controlling the ball an average of 49 percent of the
time in their games, behind Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and Peru among
others.
They also ran an average of 101 kilometres per match -- the
fifth-lowest figure at the tournament ahead of only Argentina,
Mexico, Nigeria and Panama.
Serbia, who covered nearly 113 kilometres per match, ran more than
any other team but went out in the group stage. "France went out to
win the matches in the most appropriate way for the talents they
had," former Scotland coach Andy Roxburgh, a member of FIFA's
technical study report team, told Reuters by telephone.
"They didn't play high intensity pressing football, it was very much
contain and counter attack."
But he said it would be very unfair to say France were dull.
"They scored four goals in the World Cup final and they were
incredibly entertaining in the counter attacks. There was so much
quality in the team to admire," he said.
If there were a prize for entertainment value, however, it would
likely to go to top scorers Belgium for their bold tactics in the
2-1 quarter-final win over Brazil.
[to top of second column] |
Mackenzie McDonald of the U.S. in action during the fourth round
match against Canada's Milos Raonic REUTERS/Andrew Couldridge
"You are entertained if you see people take a risk, and Belgium
versus Brazil was without doubt the most interesting game
tactically," said Roxburgh, referring to Belgium's decision to leave
three players in attack.
"I spoke to Belgium's coach (Roberto Martinez), and what they
decided to do was so high risk it took them two days to persuade the
players."
Roxburgh said one of the attractions compared with club football was
that teams still maintained their own identities and style of play
-- even though most of the top players are now based in Europe.
"If you look at the Champions league right now, you can probably
identify three different basic schools of football coming from
individual coaches from certain regions," he said.
"The great thing about international football is that there is still
definitely a style element, a way of playing... You can tell a
Colombian team, a Brazilian team, or a Japanese team."
"Clearly, players based in Europe are going to bring that
(influence) back home... But if you've been brought up in a certain
way of playing, and mentality, then you usually retain that."
"There is no transfer market so you use the players who are
available to you, and those players are brought up in home territory
with the kind of philosophy and attitudes and mentality which come
from there," he added.
"That's why people love international football." (Writing by Brian
Homewood; Editing by Hugh Lawson)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|