U.S. judge affirms Monsanto weed-killer
verdict, slashes damages
Send a link to a friend
[October 23, 2018]
By Tina Bellon
(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday affirmed
a verdict against Bayer AG <BAYGn.DE> unit Monsanto that found its
glyphosate-based weed-killers responsible for a man’s terminal cancer,
sending the German company's shares down 8 percent.
In a ruling by San Francisco's Superior Court of California, Judge
Suzanne Bolanos said she would slash the punitive damages award to $39
million from $250 million if lawyers for school groundskeeper Dewayne
Johnson agreed.
Bayer said in a statement the decision to reduce the damages was a step
in the right direction, but it would still file an appeal with the
California Court of Appeal, because the verdict was not supported by the
evidence presented at the trial.
"According to an earlier hearing, the judge toyed with the idea of
dropping the damages altogether," brokerage alpha said in a note to
clients. "Now, however, the judge made a U-turn and confirmed the jury's
previous verdict."
Monsanto, which denies the allegations, had asked the judge to throw out
the entire original $289 million verdict or order a new trial on the
punitive damages portion.
A jury on Aug. 10 found the company’s glyphosate-based weed-killers,
including RoundUp and Ranger Pro, had caused Johnson’s cancer and that
the company failed to warn consumers about the risks.
The verdict wiped 10 percent off the value of the company and marked the
first such decision against Monsanto, which faces more than 8,000
similar lawsuits in the United States.
The German company, which bought Monsanto this year for $63 billion,
says decades of scientific studies and real-world use have shown
glyphosate to be safe for human use.
Lawyers for Johnson in a statement on Monday said they were still
reviewing whether to accept the reduced award or retry the punitive
damages portion.
"The evidence presented to this jury was, quite frankly, overwhelming,"
the lawyers said.
[to top of second column]
|
Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller atomizers are displayed for sale at a
garden shop near Brussels, Belgium November 27, 2017. REUTERS/Yves
Herman
The amount of punitive damages is limited by law, and Bolanos said
California's constitution did not permit a higher award. If Johnson
accepts the reduced damages, the final verdict would order Monsanto
to pay a total of $78 million, split equally between compensatory
and punitive damages.
Bolanos' Monday decision is a turnaround from a previous tentative
ruling she issued on Oct. 10.
In that preliminary order, Bolanos said she was considering ordering
a new trial on punitive damages, saying Johnson had failed to meet
his burden of producing clear and convincing evidence of malice or
oppression by Monsanto, a requirement for allowing a jury to award
punitive damages.
But following that tentative ruling, at least five of the jurors who
delivered the Aug. 10 verdict sent letters to the judge, urging her
to uphold their decision. Bolanos did not directly refer to the
jurors' letters in her Monday ruling, but said the jury was entitled
to its findings.
In September 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
concluded a decades-long assessment of glyphosate risks and found
that the chemical was not a likely carcinogen to humans.
However, in 2015, the cancer unit of the World Health Organisation
classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans."
Johnson's case, filed in 2016, was fast-tracked for trial due to the
severity of his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer of the lymph
system, that he alleged was caused by years of glyphosate exposure.
(Additional reporting by Ismail Shakil in Bengaluru and Arno
Schuetze in Frankfurt; editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |