Top U.S. funds seek sunset rules on dual-class share
listings
Send a link to a friend
[October 24, 2018]
By Ross Kerber
BOSTON (Reuters) - A trade group
representing top U.S. pension funds and asset managers, including
BlackRock Inc and T. Rowe Price Group, will ask stock exchanges to limit
how long companies may operate with unequal voting rights for
shareholders.
The move is meant as a compromise to solve one of the trickiest issues
in American corporate governance, said Ken Bertsch, director of the
Council of Institutional Investors, based in Washington, D.C., which
organized the effort.
Past calls to bar dual-class shares have gone nowhere even as the
shareholding structures remain popular in initial public offerings of
technology companies and have led to controversies at larger firms
including Facebook Inc.
Shares of this kind are widely held by big funds despite their concerns
that the limited voting rights can lead to insular boards and poor
corporate oversight.
Large investors "need to participate in the market, so they want a
systemic solution" rather than foregoing shares of particular companies,
Bertsch said.
Specifically the trade group will ask New York Stock Exchange parent,
Intercontinental Exchange Inc, and Nasdaq Inc to require in their
listing standards that companies seeking to go public using multiple
share classes with unequal voting rights have plans to equalize them
within seven years, according to letters seen by Reuters that the trade
group plans to send on Wednesday.
Companies could extend the structures another seven years if authorized
by shareholders, voting on an equal basis, under the trade group's
proposal.
“Investors should be allowed to make an informed choice about investing
in a company with a multi-class structure,” Nelson Griggs, President of
Nasdaq Stock Exchange, said in a statement. Eliminating the choice of
using multiple share classes could lead companies to “stay private or
sell themselves. Those outcomes preclude retail public investors from
participating in the company’s growth.”
Intercontinental Exchange spokeswoman Lisette Kwong declined to comment.
In addition to the large asset managers, the Council's membership
includes top state pension funds such as the California Public
Employees' Retirement System and the Florida State Board of
Administration which oversees retirement assets.
The Council has pressed for an end to dual-class systems in the past,
and for action by regulators, to little effect so far. Stock index
providers have taken a range of stances on the question of whether to
include shares of companies with unequal rights.
[to top of second column] |
A woman passes by the
Nasdaq Market Site in Times Square in New York City, U.S., February
7, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
The Council's latest effort accepts that some companies with unequal voting
rights would continue that way.
Such companies would include cloud-storage provider Dropbox Inc, Snapchat parent
Snap Inc, and meal-kit maker Blue Apron Holdings Inc, which all have gone public
since last year with little or no voting representation for certain investors.
In all the council said 19 percent of IPOs on U.S. exchanges last year had at
least two classes of stock with different voting rights.
Some technology executives argue the unequal structures give business leaders
more leeway to focus on long term goals rather than answer to short term Wall
Street expectations.
Critics respond that the setups leave shareholders with little recourse when
problems emerge, especially over the longer term.
The issue came to a head in May at Facebook, where a majority of outside
investors backed a measure to revamp its voting structure amid concerns about
how the company had handled content and privacy issues, but the vote had no
impact given the majority control of voting rights by company founder and CEO
Mark Zuckerberg.
In a statement provided by the Council, BlackRock co-founder and vice chairman
Barbara Novick said that "BlackRock believes that equal voting rights are a
fundamental tenet of good corporate governance."
Donna Anderson, head of corporate governance at T. Rowe Price, said in an
interview there are signs that time limits for multiple share classes will catch
on. She cited a growing number of IPOs with the feature and supportive comments
about such limits from U.S. SEC commissioner Robert Jackson in February.
"We’re in a potentially unique moment of consensus," she said.
(Reporting by Ross Kerber; editing by Clive McKeef)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|