| 
 Gov. Bruce Rauner issued an amendatory veto of Senate Bill 2544 
Aug. 27, which would have allowed for a referendum on Lake County ballots in 
November asking voters if the county’s chief assessor position should be elected 
rather than appointed. 
 Rauner’s amendatory veto removed the provision specifying that this bill applies 
only to Lake County, and inserted language that would expand it to all counties, 
stating, “what is beneficial to Lake County taxpayers and voters may also be 
beneficial to citizens across the state, who should get the same opportunity to 
determine whether an elected county assessor would better serve their 
communities.”
 
 Regardless of whether having an elected assessor would improve or worsen the 
accuracy of assessments, it would do little to address the more pressing issue 
Lake County homeowners are facing: high property taxes, and the pension costs 
that are fueling them.
 
 Property tax pain in Lake County
 Illinois has some of the most expensive property taxes in the nation, and Lake 
County has some of the highest property taxes in the state. Lake County 
homeowners have seen their property taxes rise by more than $1,100 per person 
since 1996 after adjusting for inflation.
 In theory, homeowners could benefit from higher property taxes 
through higher home values, if those property tax dollars were going toward 
improving the delivery of valued services. That doesn’t seem to be the case in 
Lake County, where residential property tax bills grew more than 160 percent 
faster than home values from 1996 to 2016. Sadly, this phenomenon is not 
surprising nor unique to Lake County. Less than 50 cents of every additional 
property tax dollar levied in Illinois since 1996 has gone to services. Rather, 
the single largest driver of the increase in property taxes over that 20-year 
period was pension costs.[to top of second column]
 
 | 
 Of every additional property tax dollar that went 
			to municipal police departments in Lake County over that time, 82 
			cents went to pensions, not law enforcement. Homeowners are now 
			seeing the vast majority of their property tax dollars for police 
			flow to pension payments. The pension problem is even worse for fire 
			departments in Lake County. Residents saw a $3.6 million cut in 
			property tax dollars flowing toward fire protection and a $12.6 
			million increase in property tax dollars flowing to pension costs 
			for municipal fire departments in Lake County from 1996 to 2016.
 In 1996, 62 cents of every property tax dollar for municipal fire 
			departments went to fire protection in Lake County. But by 2016, 
			only 18 cents of each dollar went to fire protection, with the rest 
			going to pensions.
 Until state lawmakers address this overwhelming 
			rise in pension costs, Lake County residents will not see meaningful 
			property tax relief, and government workers will continue to see 
			their retirements put in jeopardy.
 A short-term solution to this problem is enrolling every new 
			government worker in a 401(k)-style retirement plan, similar to what 
			more than 20,000 state university workers have opted into. A 
			long-term solution must include a constitutional amendment to allow 
			changes in future, unearned pension benefits for government workers. 
			This would allow for reasonable changes such as ending automatic 3 
			percent annual benefit increases for retirees and bringing 
			government worker retirement ages in line with the private sector.
 
 Time is of the essence. Due to heavy outmigration, most of Lake 
			County’s largest communities are shrinking, and it is the only 
			collar county to have lost population since 2010.
 
 In order to attract and retain residents, state lawmakers must avoid 
			raising taxes and diminishing services to pay for unsustainable 
			pension promises.
 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |