| 
			
			 Real U.S. drug prices, which includes discounts and rebates 
			drugmakers provide to insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), 
			fell 5.8 percent in the quarter, compared with a 0.7 percent 
			increase a year earlier, SSR analyst Richard Evans said in a 
			research note on Tuesday. That is in line with how far prices fell 
			in the first quarter, he said. 
 Lower "real" drug prices means drugmakers are receiving less revenue 
			on sales, but does not necessarily translate into savings for 
			patients as employers and payers are more likely to reap the 
			benefit.
 
 Evans believes "copay accumulator" programs, which effectively force 
			drug companies to continue to assist patients with their copays, 
			were to blame for the declining real drug prices.
 
 "Unless manufacturers adapt their copay support programs fairly 
			drastically, net price declines may worsen in 2019," Evans said.
 
			
			 
			Gilead Sciences Inc, Eli Lilly and Co, Novo Nordisk and 
			GlaxoSmithKline Plc made the largest contribution to the real drug 
			price decline in the quarter, according to the report.
 "We continue to assess the impact of accumulators being offered in 
			the health insurance market," GSK spokeswoman Ashley Mahoney said in 
			an email, adding that the British drugmaker has faced pricing 
			pressure in the U.S. market, particularly for its respiratory 
			therapies.
 
 In recent years, insurers have tried to guide patients toward less 
			expensive treatments by making them pay a higher portion of a drug's 
			costs. Drugmakers responded by raising the financial aid they offer 
			in the form of "copay assistance" cards - similar to a debit card - 
			that reduce consumer costs at the pharmacy.
 
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			PBMs, which manage prescription drug coverage for large U.S. 
			employers, say these payments shield consumers from drug costs, 
			making it easier for manufacturers to raise prices. Insurers have to 
			make up the difference.
 Many PBMs introduced the copay accumulator approach for their 
			corporate customers this year. The programs prevent copay card funds 
			from counting toward a patient's required out-of-pocket spending 
			before insurance kicks in on expensive specialty drugs.
 
			Major pharmaceutical companies are trying to limit the damage from 
			the tactic.
 Still, most large drug companies did not address the issue of copay 
			accumulators during conference calls to review second quarter 
			results. Amgen Inc and Eli Lilly played down the effect the programs 
			were having their own bottom lines.
 
 Evans said he believes more employers will add the programs next 
			year. A recent survey of large corporate employers by the National 
			Business Group on Health showed that around 25 percent of 
			respondents already had copay accumulator programs in place, and 
			another 3 percent will be adding them next year. An additional 21 
			percent is considering the programs for 2020 or 2021, the survey 
			found.
 
 Representatives for Gilead, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk could not be 
			immediately reached for comment.
 
 (Reporting by Michael Erman and Caroline Humer; editing by Bill 
			Berkrot)
 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |