| 
		Kaepernick ads spark boycott calls, but 
		Nike is seen as winning in the end 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 05, 2018] 
		By Daniel Trotta 
 (Reuters) - Protesters burned their Nike 
		shoes, investors sold shares and some consumers demanded a boycott after 
		the footwear and apparel maker launched an advertising campaign 
		featuring Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterback who sparked a national 
		controversy by kneeling during the national anthem.
 
 But the brand recognition that comes with the campaign may be just what 
		the company wanted, and marketing experts predicted it would ultimately 
		succeed.
 
 The ad revived a raging debate in the United States that started in 2016 
		when Kaepernick, then with the San Francisco 49ers, began kneeling to 
		protest multiple police shootings of unarmed black men.
 
 "This is right on the money for Nike. They stand for this irreverent, 
		rebellious attitude. In this case, it's reinforcing the brand," said 
		Erich Joachimsthaler, CEO of strategy consulting firm Vivaldi.
 
 While some fans praised Kaepernick and other players who joined him in 
		kneeling as patriotic dissenters, critics led by U.S. President Donald 
		Trump blasted the protesters as ungrateful and disrespectful.
 
 Trump called Nike's campaign "a terrible decision" in an interview with 
		the Daily Caller published on Tuesday, but he also showed some respect 
		for Kaepernick's right to speak out.
 
		
		 
		"As much as I disagree with the Colin Kaepernick endorsement, in another 
		way — I mean, I wouldn't have done it. In another way, it is what this 
		country is all about, that you have certain freedoms to do things that 
		other people think you shouldn't do," Trump said.
 The NFL, which gave in to pressure from Trump and ordered players not to 
		kneel on the field during the anthem, nonetheless praised Kaepernick.
 
 "The social justice issues that Colin and other professional athletes 
		have raised deserve our attention and action," said Jocelyn Moore, the 
		NFL's executive vice president of communications and public affairs.
 
 In the immediate backlash against the campaign, announced on Monday, 
		Nike shares fell nearly 4 percent at one point on Tuesday and closed 
		down 3.2 percent.
 
 Calls for a boycott fed social media buzz about the campaign. There were 
		2.7 million mentions of Nike over the previous 24 hours, the social 
		media analysis firm Talkwalker said at midday, an increase of 135 
		percent over the previous week.
 
 After his protests, Kaepernick could not find a job for the 2017 season 
		and sued the National Football League, accusing owners of colluding to 
		blackball him. He is still without a team.
 
 Nike has sponsored Kaepernick since 2011 and said he will be one of 
		several faces for a campaign marking the 30th anniversary of its "Just 
		Do It" slogan.
 
		The ad refers to Kaepernick's loss of NFL income with the quote: 
		"Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything."
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Former San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick appears as a face 
			of Nike Inc advertisement marking the 30th anniversary of its "Just 
			Do It" slogan in this image released by Nike in Beaverton, Oregon, 
			U.S., September 4, 2018. Courtesy Nike/Handout via REUTERS 
            
			 
            Some who were offended by the choice posted social media pictures of 
			Nike shoes they had set on fire or socks with the Nike swoosh cut 
			out.
 Twitter user Sean Clancy, or @sclancy79, posted a picture of a pair 
			of Nike trainers on fire on Tuesday that was retweeted 20,000 
			times.Athletes including Serena Williams, LeBron James, Kevin Durant 
			and Chris Paul showed support.
 
 The controversy may have been a convenient excuse for some investors 
			to sell an over-valued stock, Vivaldi's Joachimsthaler said.
 
 Christopher Svezia, a footwear and apparel analyst at Wedbush 
			Securities Inc., said Nike shares were trading at roughly 30 times 
			next year's forecast earnings, compared with 24 percent for rival 
			Adidas.
 
 "Nike more than anyone else really knows who their customer is," 
			Svezia said, describing them as largely 14- to 22-year-old males.
 
 Matt Powell, a senior adviser with market research firm NPD Group, 
			predicted the boycott would fizzle. "Old angry white guys are not a 
			core demographic for Nike," he said.
 
 Barry Lowenthal, CEO of The Media Kitchen, praised the campaign and 
			said Nike has long proven successful in using celebrity endorsements 
			to promote its brand, a precursor to what is known as influencer 
			marking in the social media age.
 
 "These kind of endorsement deals were the first version of 
			influencer marketing. Of course they know it works. It's classic 
			product placement," Lowenthal said.
 
 Even former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad weighed in, 
			tweeting: "The #NFL season will start this week, unfortunately once 
			again @Kaepernick7 is not on a NFL roster."
 
 (Reporting by Daniel Trotta, Uday Sampath Kumar and Emma Thomasson; 
			editing by Patrick Graham and Dan Grebler)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |