| 
			Kaepernick ads spark boycott calls, but Nike is seen as winning in 
			the end 
		 Send a link to a friend 
			
			 [September 05, 2018] 
			By Daniel Trotta 
 (Reuters) - Protesters burned their 
			Nike shoes, investors sold shares and some consumers demanded a 
			boycott after the footwear and apparel maker launched an advertising 
			campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterback who sparked 
			a national controversy by kneeling during the national anthem.
 
 But the brand recognition that comes with the campaign may be just 
			what the company wanted, and marketing experts predicted it would 
			ultimately succeed.
 
 The ad revived a raging debate in the United States that started in 
			2016 when Kaepernick, then with the San Francisco 49ers, began 
			kneeling to protest multiple police shootings of unarmed black men.
 
 "This is right on the money for Nike. They stand for this 
			irreverent, rebellious attitude. In this case, it's reinforcing the 
			brand," said Erich Joachimsthaler, CEO of strategy consulting firm 
			Vivaldi.
 
 While some fans praised Kaepernick and other players who joined him 
			in kneeling as patriotic dissenters, critics led by U.S. President 
			Donald Trump blasted the protesters as ungrateful and disrespectful.
 
			
			 
			Trump called Nike's campaign "a terrible decision" in an interview 
			with the Daily Caller published on Tuesday, but he also showed some 
			respect for Kaepernick's right to speak out.
 "As much as I disagree with the Colin Kaepernick endorsement, in 
			another way — I mean, I wouldn't have done it. In another way, it is 
			what this country is all about, that you have certain freedoms to do 
			things that other people think you shouldn't do," Trump said.
 
 The NFL, which gave in to pressure from Trump and ordered players 
			not to kneel on the field during the anthem, nonetheless praised 
			Kaepernick.
 
 "The social justice issues that Colin and other professional 
			athletes have raised deserve our attention and action," said Jocelyn 
			Moore, the NFL's executive vice president of communications and 
			public affairs.
 
 In the immediate backlash against the campaign, announced on Monday, 
			Nike shares fell nearly 4 percent at one point on Tuesday and closed 
			down 3.2 percent.
 
 Calls for a boycott fed social media buzz about the campaign. There 
			were 2.7 million mentions of Nike over the previous 24 hours, the 
			social media analysis firm Talkwalker said at midday, an increase of 
			135 percent over the previous week.
 
 After his protests, Kaepernick could not find a job for the 2017 
			season and sued the National Football League, accusing owners of 
			colluding to blackball him. He is still without a team.
 
 Nike has sponsored Kaepernick since 2011 and said he will be one of 
			several faces for a campaign marking the 30th anniversary of its 
			"Just Do It" slogan.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Former San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick appears as a face 
			of Nike Inc advertisement marking the 30th anniversary of its "Just 
			Do It" slogan in this image released by Nike in Beaverton, Oregon, 
			U.S., September 4, 2018. Courtesy Nike/Handout via REUTERS 
            
			 
            The ad refers to Kaepernick's loss of NFL income with the quote: 
			"Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything."
 Some who were offended by the choice posted social media pictures of 
			Nike shoes they had set on fire or socks with the Nike swoosh cut 
			out.
 
 Twitter user Sean Clancy, or @sclancy79, posted a picture of a pair 
			of Nike trainers on fire on Tuesday that was retweeted 20,000 
			times.Athletes including Serena Williams, LeBron James, Kevin Durant 
			and Chris Paul showed support.
 
 The controversy may have been a convenient excuse for some investors 
			to sell an over-valued stock, Vivaldi's Joachimsthaler said.
 
 Christopher Svezia, a footwear and apparel analyst at Wedbush 
			Securities Inc., said Nike shares were trading at roughly 30 times 
			next year's forecast earnings, compared with 24 percent for rival 
			Adidas.
 
 "Nike more than anyone else really knows who their customer is," 
			Svezia said, describing them as largely 14- to 22-year-old males.
 
 Matt Powell, a senior adviser with market research firm NPD Group, 
			predicted the boycott would fizzle. "Old angry white guys are not a 
			core demographic for Nike," he said.
 
 Barry Lowenthal, CEO of The Media Kitchen, praised the campaign and 
			said Nike has long proven successful in using celebrity endorsements 
			to promote its brand, a precursor to what is known as influencer 
			marking in the social media age.
 
 "These kind of endorsement deals were the first version of 
			influencer marketing. Of course they know it works. It's classic 
			product placement," Lowenthal said.
 
            
			 
			Even former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad weighed in, 
			tweeting: "The #NFL season will start this week, unfortunately once 
			again @Kaepernick7 is not on a NFL roster."
 (Reporting by Daniel Trotta, Uday Sampath Kumar and Emma Thomasson; 
			editing by Patrick Graham and Dan Grebler)
 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |