Researchers followed 59 obese patients who had sleeve gastrectomy
operations between 2006 and 2009, before this type of weight-loss
operation was widely accepted or covered by insurance. Back then,
this operation was generally reserved for patients who were either
"super-obese" or who had other medical conditions that made
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) too risky.
Researchers compared these patients to a similar group of severely
obese or high-risk surgical patients who had the more commonly
performed RYGB surgery.
After seven years, both types of surgery were associated with
lasting weight loss as well as reductions in obesity-related health
problems like diabetes, high blood pressure and elevated
cholesterol, the study found.
But sleeve gastrectomy was tied to less weight loss: 24 percent
versus 30 percent with RGYB.
"For those higher risk bariatric surgical patients, it would be
reasonable for them to consider that a RYGB may be a better choice
than a sleeve gastrectomy, especially if longer-term weight loss is
an important goal," said lead study author Dr. Bestoun Ahmed of the
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
"Additionally, there is more and longer-term evidence in the
literature of weight loss durability with RYGB," Ahmed said by
email.
With a sleeve gastrectomy, surgeons divide and remove around 80
percent of the stomach using special surgical staplers, which leaves
the stomach looking like a long thin banana, said Dr. Oliver Varban,
director of the adult bariatric surgery program at Michigan Medicine
in Ann Arbor.
For the RYGB operation, the same surgical staplers are used to
divide the stomach to create a small pouch about the size of an egg,
said Varban, who wasn't involved in the study. Surgeons then create
a connection between the pouch and the small intestine so that food
travels directly into the end of the small intestine, bypassing the
stomach and the first portion of the small intestine.
While previous studies have linked RYGB to better long-term weight
loss than sleeve gastrectomy, the study results offer fresh evidence
that both procedures may have lasting health benefits, Varban said
by email.
[to top of second column] |
"They show that both procedures have profound benefits (in terms of)
diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, even though weight loss
outcomes were not the same," Varban said. "This is an important
point as it suggests that both gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy
produce similar health effects and that weight loss alone may not be
the best metric for success."
As recently as 2011, sleeve gastrectomy accounted for less than
one-fifth of bariatric procedures, but by 2016 it accounted for more
than half of these operations, researchers note in Surgery.
"It is somewhat premature to declare the issue of the comparison
between sleeve gastrectomy and RYGB established," as there isn't
much data yet on long-term outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy, said
Dr. Bruce Wolfe, a researcher at Oregon Health and Science
University who wasn't involved in the study.
"One of the major challenges ... is long-term complications,
particularly those that require reoperation," Wolfe said by email.
Surgical weight loss has gained traction in recent years as a
growing number of extremely obese patients turn to this option after
failing to lose weight through diet, exercise or medication. Like
all surgery, it isn't risk free, and bariatric operations in
particular carry a risk of malnutrition.
While more research is still needed with longer-term outcomes,
results from the current study and other research to date suggest
that what's best for severely obese patients may be different than
what's ideal for people who aren't quite as obese, said Dr. Brian
Smith of UC Irvine Health in Orange, California.
"Taken as a whole, these studies suggest that standard obese
patients do well with sleeve or gastric bypass, but that larger
patients may benefit most from more aggressive operations such as
gastric bypass," Smith, who wasn't involved in the study, said by
email.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2Njstlf Surgery, online August 20, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |