| 
		Trump administration seeks to end 
		agreement on child migrant detention 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 07, 2018] 
		By Yeganeh Torbati 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump 
		administration said on Thursday it plans to withdraw from a federal 
		court agreement that strictly limits the conditions under which 
		authorities can detain migrant children, and proposed new rules it said 
		would enable it to detain minors during their immigration proceedings.
 
 The administration has long targeted the Flores Settlement Agreement, a 
		1997 federal consent decree that places significant curbs on how long 
		and in what conditions the government can detain migrant children as it 
		seeks to dissuade migrants from crossing the U.S. southern border.
 
 The regulation released on Thursday, if it goes into effect, would 
		enshrine some of the protections while circumventing others, by allowing 
		the government to detain children in facilities not licensed by state 
		authorities to hold minors.
 
 Immigrants and their advocates are expected to mount legal challenges to 
		the move. The agreement has been interpreted over the years to set a 
		20-day limit on detaining children who entered the country illegally, 
		and also requires facilities that house migrant children to be licensed 
		by a state authority.
 
		
		 
		Trump administration officials have repeatedly referred to the 
		agreement's standards as "loopholes" that attract migrants by forcing 
		authorities to release people pending their immigration hearings.
 Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen repeated that reasoning, 
		saying in a statement that "legal loopholes" prevent the government from 
		detaining and deporting migrant families.
 
 "This rule addresses one of the primary pull factors for illegal 
		immigration and allows the federal government to enforce immigration 
		laws as passed by Congress," Nielsen said.
 
 Thursday's regulatory filing said the government would seek to terminate 
		the Flores settlement, and put forward regulations it said "parallel the 
		relevant and substantive terms" of the agreement.
 
 The new rules would ensure "that all juveniles in the government's 
		custody are treated with dignity, respect, and special concern for their 
		particular vulnerability as minors," the regulation said.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Immigrant children now housed in a tent encampment under the new 
			"zero tolerance" policy by the Trump administration are shown 
			walking in single file at the facility near the Mexican border in 
			Tornillo, Texas, U.S., June 19, 2018. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo 
            
 
            One significant change would be a new licensing system to allow 
			authorities to hold children in detention centers that are not 
			licensed by state authorities to hold children.
 The facilities would be licensed by an outside auditor employed by 
			the Department of Homeland Security that would ensure the sites 
			comply with standards established by Immigration and Customs 
			Enforcement (ICE), the regulation says.
 
 The American Civil Liberties Union criticized the administration's 
			decision to withdraw from the agreement.
 
 "It is sickening to see the United States government looking for 
			ways to jail more children for longer," said Omar Jadwat, director 
			of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project.
 
 The administration earlier this year asked a federal court to ease 
			the limits mandated by the Flores agreement, but the judge 
			overseeing the agreement, U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee, 
			rejected those requests.
 
 That attempt by the administration came after it instituted a 
			"zero-tolerance" policy at the U.S. border with Mexico that led to 
			the separation of thousands of migrant children from their parents. 
			After intense public outcry, the administration was forced to 
			abandon that policy, but hundreds of children remain separated from 
			parents who were deported without them.
 
 The public has 60 days to comment on the proposal, followed by a 
			45-day period before the court settlement is terminated.
 
 (Additional reporting by Tom Hals; Editing by David Gregorio and 
			James Dalgleish)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |