U.S. military drawing up options should
Syria use chemical weapons
Send a link to a friend
[September 08, 2018]
By Phil Stewart
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - America's top general
on Saturday said he was involved in "routine dialogue" with the White
House about military options should Syria ignore U.S. warnings against
using chemical weapons in an expected assault on the enclave of Idlib.
Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
said no decision had been made by the United States to employ military
force in response to a future chemical attack in Syria.
"But we are in a dialogue, a routine dialogue, with the president to
make sure he knows where we are with regard to planning in the event
that chemical weapons are used," he told a small group of reporters
during a trip to India. Dunford later added: "He expects us to have
military options and we have provided updates to him on the development
of those military options."
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has massed his army and allied forces
on the front lines in the northwest, and Russian planes have joined his
bombardment of rebels there, in a prelude to a widely expected assault
despite objections from Turkey.
This week, a top U.S. envoy said there was "lots of evidence" that
chemical weapons were being prepared by Syrian government forces in
Idlib.
The White House has warned that the United States and its allies would
respond "swiftly and vigorously" if government forces used chemical
weapons in Idlib. President Donald Trump has twice bombed Syria over its
alleged use of chemical weapons, in April 2017 and April 2018.
Dunford did not say, one way or the other, what he expected Trump to do
should Syria use chemical weapons again.
France's top military official also said last week his forces were
prepared to carry out strikes on Syrian targets if chemical weapons were
used in Idlib.
Dunford declined to comment on U.S. intelligence about the possible
Syrian preparations of chemical agents.
"I wouldn't comment on intelligence at all, in terms of what we have,
what we don't have," he said.
'DISAPPOINTING'
Idlib is the insurgents' only remaining major stronghold and a
government offensive could be the last decisive battle in a war that has
killed more than half a million people and forced 11 million to flee
their homes.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Joseph Dunford attends a meeting
of the National Space Council in the East Room of the White House in
Washington, U.S., June 18, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo
The presidents of Turkey, Iran and Russia on Friday failed to agree on a
ceasefire that would forestall an offensive.
Asked whether there was still a chance the assault on Idlib could be
averted, Dunford said: "I don't know if there's anything that can stop
it."
"It's certainly disappointing but perhaps not (surprising) that the
Russians, the Turks and the Iranians weren't able to come up with a
solution yesterday," he said.
Tehran and Moscow have helped Assad turn the course of the war against
an array of opponents ranging from Western-backed rebels to the Islamist
militants, while Turkey is a leading opposition supporter and has troops
in the country.
Turkey says it fears a massacre and it can not accommodate any more
refugees flooding over its border.
But Russia's Vladimir Putin said on Friday a ceasefire would be
pointless as it would not involve Islamist militant groups it deems
terrorists.
Dunford has warned about the potential for a humanitarian catastrophe in
Idlib and instead has recommended more narrowly tailored operations
against militants there. "There's a more effective way to do
counterterrorism operations than major conventional operations in
Idlib," he said.
(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|