Republicans urge more tax cuts as
elections near
Send a link to a friend
[September 11, 2018]
By David Morgan and Amanda Becker
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With congressional
elections looming, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on
Monday proposed more deficit-expanding tax cuts, an effort seen by some
tax experts as unlikely to become law and geared chiefly toward winning
votes.
Even if the initiative fails to pass, it could put Democrats in the
position of opposing the new tax-cut plan on the House floor, which
Republicans could seek to use to their advantage in the Nov. 6 elections
where control of Congress will be at stake.
Under the measure, federal individual income tax cuts approved on a
temporary basis by the Republican-controlled Congress and President
Donald Trump in December would become permanent.
It would also eliminate the maximum age for some retirement account
contributions and let new businesses write off more start-up costs.
House tax committee Chairman Kevin Brady, main author of the "Tax Reform
2.0" package, plans to put it to a committee-level vote on Thursday,
with a full House vote expected by Oct 1.
Trump and his Republicans are touting December's tax cuts as a boost to
the economy, an important feature of their campaign push to defend their
majorities in the House and U.S. Senate against a challenge from
Democrats.
Democrats say those cuts mainly helped the wealthy and corporations.
In a statement on Monday, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said:
“With version 2.0 of the GOP tax scam for the rich, Republicans want to
add even more to the deficit, and even more to the bank accounts of the
wealthiest 1 percent."
The cuts passed in December are projected to add an estimated $1.5
trillion over a decade to the federal deficit, the difference between
Washington's spending and the taxes it collects.
The new round being proposed by Republicans would add a further $576
billion to the deficit, even taking possibly higher economic growth into
account, said the Tax Foundation, a pro-business think tank in
Washington.
"Regardless of the merits of the House GOP plan, we view it as a
political move ahead of the midterm elections that has no chance of
passing Congress in the short term," the investment firm Keefe, Bruyette
& Woods said in a Monday note to clients.
[to top of second column]
|
Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Kevin Brady (R-TX)
holds up a sample tax form as he speaks during a media briefing
after the House Republican conference on Capitol Hill in Washington,
U.S., April 17, 2018. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts -/File Photo
"Adding another several hundred billion dollars to the deficit is
something that I think some Republicans are going to really think
hard about," said John Gimigliano, who heads federal tax legislative
and regulatory services at the audit, tax and advisory firm KPMG
LLP.
"Passage is not automatic," he added.
WINNING ISSUE?
Even so, Republican lawmakers and strategists hope a new tax debate
will amplify the party's upbeat economic message. They tout a report
by the Tax Foundation that forecast the creation of 1.5 million jobs
and wage increases if the temporary individual tax cuts are made
permanent.
"Anytime we're talking about tax cuts and the growing economy, we're
winning," said Matt Gorman, a spokesman for the National Republican
Congressional Committee, the party's main campaign support for House
Republican candidates.
Still, some Republicans from Democratic-leaning states worry that
constituents already dislike December's cap on the federal deduction
for state and local tax payments, known as SALT.
A dozen House Republicans opposed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act last
December. All but one were from high-tax Democratic states such as
New York, New Jersey and California. The new package would make the
capped SALT deduction permanent.
Under Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, the federal
deficit has begun growing rapidly again and is expected to blow
through $1 trillion in 2019.
If that happens, it would be the first time since 2012 the U.S.
economy would have to support such a large deficit, highlighting a
basic shift for the Republican Party, which once prided itself on
fiscal conservatism.
(Reporting by David Morgan and Amanda Becker; Editing by Kevin
Drawbaugh and Peter Cooney)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |