Sessions limits U.S. judges' ability to
dismiss deportation cases
Send a link to a friend
[September 20, 2018]
By Kristina Cooke and Reade Levinson
SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced new limits on the ability of
immigration judges to terminate deportation cases on Wednesday, the
latest in a series of decisions to facilitate the removal of immigrants
in the country illegally.
Unlike the federal judiciary system, U.S. immigration courts fall under
the Department of Justice and the attorney general can rewrite opinions
issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Sessions, a Republican
former U.S. senator appointed by President Donald Trump, has been
unusually active in this practice compared to his predecessors.
In his most recent decision, Sessions said judges can only terminate or
dismiss cases in “specific and circumscribed” circumstances. Judges
“have no inherent authority to terminate removal proceedings even though
a particular case may pose sympathetic circumstances,” he said.
The decision laid out specific circumstances under which immigration
judges can terminate deportation proceedings, including in cases where
the government cannot prove its case for removal. Judges can also
terminate proceedings if the government asks for a dismissal or to allow
an immigrant time for a final hearing on a pending petition for
naturalization when the matter involves “exceptionally appealing or
humanitarian factors.”
Having a deportation case terminated does not confer legal status on an
immigrant, but it does give them time to pursue other avenues of
remaining in the country legally. The Department of Homeland Security
can place immigrants whose cases are dismissed back into deportation
proceedings with a new charging document.
[to top of second column]
|
United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks at Valor Survive
and Thrive Conference in Waukegan, Illinois, U.S., September 19,
2018. REUTERS/Kamil Krzaczynski
“The decision is the next step in a concerted effort by the A.G. to
undermine judicial independence and to minimize the role of judges in
immigration court,” said Kate Voigt, associate director of government
relations at the American Immigration Lawyers’ Association.
Dana Leigh Marks, president emeritus of the National Association of
Immigration Judges, said the decision “shows again the amount of
pressure being applied to judges to move cases forward toward removal as
quickly as possible.”
The Department of Justice declined to comment.
(Reporting by Kristina Cooke in San Francisco and Reade Levinson in New
York; Editing by Tom Brown)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |