WADA lifted the ban on RUSADA, subject to
conditions, on Thursday, thus incurring the wrath of athletes
and other anti-doping bodies.
Former WADA director general David Howman termed the decision
"money over principle", which Reedie vehemently denied in an
open letter.
"...the accusation that WADA – and me personally – have pandered
to the interests of money over clean sport are totally untrue,
and deeply offensive," Reedie wrote.
"The author of those remarks, as a former Director General of
WADA, should know better.
"This week's decision was based entirely on achieving Russian
compliance, as properly delivered. A regularly monitored
anti-doping process in Russia is surely the best way to reassure
athletes there, and elsewhere, that clean sport prevails."
RUSADA was suspended in November, 2015 after an independent WADA
report carried out by Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren outlined
evidence of widespread state-backed, systematic doping and
cover-ups in Russian sport.
Russia acknowledged the report but has consistently denied the
existence of a state-sponsored doping program.
Reedie said the doping saga "poisoned sport and its place in the
world" but reminded WADA was quick to confront the scandal "with
two long-running and independent investigations."
He said the criticism of the RUSADA reinstatement was
"understandable" but WADA's mandate was to develop a "robust
Russian anti-doping agency".
"Our pressure to secure progress and concessions has been
unrelenting, even if the language we have used may have been
polite, and even diplomatic," he said.
Reedie said Russia had met 29 of the 31 criteria of the
compliance roadmap.
"Only the acknowledgement of wrongdoing and access to the Moscow
laboratory remained..."
(Reporting by Amlan Chakraborty in New Delhi; editing by
Christian Radnedge)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|