| 
		 
		Trump's election meddling charge against 
		China marks U.S. pressure campaign 
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [September 28, 2018] 
		By Matt Spetalnick and David Brunnstrom 
		 
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald 
		Trump’s accusation of Chinese meddling in upcoming U.S. elections marks 
		a new phase in an escalating pressure campaign against Beijing that 
		Washington is pursuing on multiple fronts, senior U.S. officials said on 
		Thursday. 
		 
		National security adviser John Bolton, long considered a China hawk, has 
		played a key role in persuading Trump to take a tougher approach toward 
		Beijing that goes beyond the bitter trade war between the world’s two 
		biggest economies and includes disputes such as cyber activities, Taiwan 
		and the South China Sea, two officials told Reuters. 
		 
		While the strategy is still taking shape, the push against China is 
		expected to bring further sharp U.S. rhetoric and unspecified policy 
		actions in coming weeks, according to one of the officials, who spoke on 
		condition of anonymity. 
		 
		The White House did not address Reuters questions on these points. 
		 
		Trump’s claim at the United Nations on Wednesday that China was trying 
		to sway the Nov. 6 U.S. congressional elections against his Republican 
		Party to punish him over trade, without offering any evidence, came at 
		time of increasingly tense relations between Washington and Beijing. 
		
		
		  
		
		 
		 
		It also raised questions as to whether Trump was trying to deflect 
		attention from an investigation of his campaign’s possible ties to 
		alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and also set 
		up China for the blame if Republicans do poorly in the midterm vote, 
		which will determine whether they keep control of Congress. 
		 
		The senior official insisted, however, there was a growing sense within 
		the White House that Trump needed to issue a high-profile reminder that 
		China was another powerful rival, besides Russia, waging “hybrid 
		warfare” against U.S. interests. 
		 
		Among recent points of conflict was Washington’s sanctioning of a 
		Chinese military agency and its director for buying fighter jets and a 
		missile system from Russia, in breach of U.S. sanctions on Moscow. 
		Beijing on Saturday summoned the U.S. ambassador in Beijing and 
		postponed joint military talks. 
		 
		'INCREASED PRESSURE ACROSS THE BOARD' 
		 
		The Trump administration is looking to push back harder against China on 
		several fronts, including so-called political “influence operations,” an 
		issue on which Trump recently has been given a lot more information in 
		his intelligence briefings, according to the official. 
		 
		“We are in a spot where we can start acting with increased pressure 
		across the board, especially because of trade action,” the official 
		said. 
		 
		Washington has long identified China as a major culprit in the cyber 
		hacking of U.S. government and corporate databases, but U.S. officials 
		and independent analysts say they have not detected the kind of 
		systematic political campaign, including manipulation of social media, 
		that Russia is alleged to have conducted during the 2016 election. 
		 
		China has strongly denied any effort to interfere in the U.S. elections, 
		calling such accusations “slander.” 
		
		On Wednesday, the only specific action by China that Trump cited was 
		that it was "placing propaganda ads" in U.S. newspapers, referring to a 
		Chinese government-run media company's four-page supplement in the 
		Sunday Des Moines Register promoting the mutual benefits of U.S.-China 
		trade. 
		 
		Iowa, which voted for Trump in 2016, is a state whose farmers face 
		damage from any protracted trade war, which has already featured 
		billions of dollars in tit-for-tax tariffs. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            
			White House national Security Advisor John Bolton listens as U.S. 
			President Donald Trump holds a cabinet meeting at the White House in 
			Washington, U.S., August 16, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque 
            
			  
            However, the practice of foreign governments buying space in U.S. 
			newspapers to promote trade is common and differs from a clandestine 
			operation run by a national intelligence agency. 
			 
			"The Chinese government uses all kinds of methods to try to get us 
			to turn back our policies," a White House National Security Council 
			spokesman said when asked for comment. 
			 
			"They are targeting tariffs and retaliation at farmers and workers 
			in states and districts that voted for President Trump, and they are 
			using other political, economic, commercial, military, and media 
			tools to benefit the interests of the Chinese Communist Party."  
			 
			The Trump administration appears determined to push back more 
			broadly, even at the risk of a harsh response from Beijing. 
			 
			Washington, for instance, is considering tougher action against 
			Chinese cyber theft and cyber espionage, the U.S. official said, but 
			declined to provide details. 
			 
			Earlier this week, the U.S. military showed it was willing to 
			continue bucking China’s claim to the disputed South China Sea when 
			it flew B-52 bombers over the strategic waterway, 
			 
			China was angered this week when the United States approved the sale 
			of spare parts for F-16 fighter planes and other military aircraft 
			worth up to $330 million to Taiwan, which China considers a wayward 
			province. 
            
			  
             
			 
			U.S. officials, meanwhile, are increasingly concerned that China is 
			no longer fully enforcing some sanctions on North Korea, and say 
			they intend to keep up pressure in this area. 
			 
			But some analysts questioned the wisdom of going too far. 
			 
			“Friction and leverage can be useful tools in international 
			relations if used judiciously, particularly in response to 
			problematic behavior like China’s,” said Daniel Russel of the Asia 
			Society Policy Institute, who was until last year the State 
			Department's top diplomat for East Asia. 
			 
			“But an aggressive, frontal assault across sectors is unlikely to 
			succeed, particularly against a country as large and powerful as 
			China,” he said. 
			 
			(Reporting By Matt Spetalnick and David Brunnstrom, additional 
			reporting by John Walcott and Jonathan Landay; editing by Clive 
			McKeef) 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.  |