Consider commissioner to heal rifts, Wimbledon chief says
Send a link to a friend
[September 28, 2018]
By Ossian Shine
LONDON (Reuters) - World tennis should
consider appointing a global commissioner to bring rival governing
factions together for the good of the sport, the chairman of
Wimbledon says.
Tensions over tournaments, ranking points and new events in an
already crowded calendar have bubbled to the surface in recent
weeks, most notably with the ITF's controversial re-fashioning of
the Davis Cup men's team competition into a year-end one-week
extravaganza.
The new Davis Cup is due to kick off in 2019 and the ATP also
intends to stage its own similar 24-team World Team Cup in Australia
from January of 2020, less than two months after the Davis Cup
final.
"I would say there is more unilateral behavior and discord in our
sport among the governing bodies than I’ve seen in the sport in 20
years," Wimbledon chief Phillip Brook told a small group of
reporters.
"I think it would be great if tennis could do a better job of coming
together and trying to figure things out and try to act in the best
interests of tennis with everybody pulling in the right direction."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155c/a155c79d2dbfe87ea4745a8ab2781e17ffdd9a12" alt=""
Brook said the four grand slam tournaments, the ITF, the ATP and
women's tour organizers the WTA need to do a better job of
collaborating.
"There has been growing competition I would say in the last few
years. Our view would be on the whole it’s been unhelpful," Brook
said over lunch at a tennis club in north-west London.
"People say 'Oh we need a commissioner of tennis' and so on... I
would be the first to say this is an idea worth exploring.
"And you can start the conversation, I don’t think starting the
conversation is difficult, it’s when the conversation gets difficult
that it gets difficult. Because nobody wants somebody else telling
them what to do.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c7d/63c7d141b145b053b97d2d8b108a8d510e50516d" alt=""
Serbia's Novak Djokovic celebrates with the trophy after winning the
men's singles final against South Africa's Kevin Anderson.
REUTERS/Andrew Couldridge/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10238/10238a5cead6684c217c7c0e8bb5bccd8ba18c17" alt=""
"If you want to make change... somebody over here says 'Hang on a
minute that doesn’t work for me'. So you need somebody or a few
people who have got the authority, who have been given the authority
by the sport, to act on everybody’s behalf. It would be a brave step
for the sport to take."
Brook said he imagines all seven stakeholders would agree with his
stance for collaboration, but that the challenge would be persuading
anyone to release an element of control.
The ATP runs the men's professional tennis tour and allocates men's
world ranking points, while the WTA performs that function for the
women. The four grand slam tournaments -- Wimbledon, the French,
U.S. and Australian Opens -- all offer ATP and WTA ranking points,
while the ITF's showpiece team events, the Davis and Fed Cups, do
not.
The conflicting tensions present a considerable challenge --
probably too much for one person to solve.
"I don't know whether a commissioner is the answer... I think giving
all of that responsibility to one person is probably too much,"
Brook said.
"But I think it’s a very hard problem to solve because seven
groupings, everybody has a slightly different agenda... It doesn’t
show our sport off in the best light, I think, some of the things
that are going on."
(Editing by Ed Osmond)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7233f/7233f31b4fb8778af8e9f595a5c3adbc52c6a944" alt="" |