|
 Illinois lawmakers are considering making it harder on
themselves to take more from Illinois taxpayers.
State Sen. Dan McConchie, R-Hawthorn Woods, introduced Senate Joint Resolution
Constitutional Amendment 12, which would require a two-thirds majority in both
the Illinois Senate and House of Representatives before state lawmakers could
increase any tax levied at the state level. Currently, Illinois lawmakers need a
simple majority to pass a tax hike.
Most of Illinois’ neighboring states – Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri and
Wisconsin – currently enforce some form of supermajority requirements for state
lawmakers to pass tax hikes, according to the National Conference of State
Legislatures.
 The amendment is good news in Illinois, where state leaders’ main discussions
have been about how to tax their way out of fiscal crisis.
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s proposed budget includes a slew of proposed tax
and fee increases totaling $4.5 billion. This includes the first statewide
plastic bag tax and a new tax on e-cigarettes, as well as tax hikes on
cigarettes, video gambling and Medicare providers. Outside the governor’s budget
proposal, lawmakers in Springfield are proposing to double the state’s gas tax.
Illinoisans’ gas taxes already rank 10th-highest in the nation, but would
skyrocket to second-highest under that increase.
Each of these pending tax hikes would be subject to a supermajority vote under
the proposed amendment.
The defining feature of Pritzker’s term has been repeated calls for a graduated,
or progressive income tax system, which would require scrapping the state’s
constitutional flat tax provision.
[to top of second column] |
The state’s flat income tax is one of Illinoisans’
only protections against endless income tax increases. Why? Because
lawmakers face higher political risk raising a uniform tax rate
statewide. Under a progressive tax system, lawmakers may target
smaller groups of taxpayers at a time to relatively muted
resistance. In Connecticut, the only state to switch from a flat to
progressive system in 30 years, the median family has seen income
taxes rise by more than 13 percent during the past decade,
residents’ property tax bills climbed by more than 35 percent and
poverty increased.
Illinois Policy Institute research has shown Pritzker’s proposed tax
rates fall far short of the $3.4 billion his office projects – and
would generate far less than the funds necessary to keep his
spending promises. Middle-income families would inevitably see their
tax rates spike to pay the difference. The governor’s office has
already walked back its promise of tax relief for most Illinoisans.
Illinoisans endure the highest overall tax burden in the nation,
driven by both state lawmakers’ penchant for tax hikes and a local
property tax burden that has for years ranked second highest.
For decades, Springfield has failed to address the primary cost
drivers – state employee health care and pensions – instead using
record tax hikes that are still failing to fix the problems. By
making it harder for state lawmakers to punish Illinoisans for
lawmakers’ own fiscal mismanagement, SJRCA 12 would be a win for
taxpayers.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
 |
