Democrats in Congress authorize subpoenas
for Trump-Russia report, legal battle looms
Send a link to a friend
[April 04, 2019]
By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. congressional
Democrats on Wednesday authorized a powerful committee chairman to
subpoena Special Counsel Robert Mueller's full report on Russia's role
in the 2016 election, moving closer to a legal clash with President
Donald Trump's administration.
The Democratic-led House of Representatives Judiciary Committee voted to
enable its chairman, Jerrold Nadler, to subpoena the Justice Department
to obtain Mueller's unredacted report and all underlying evidence as
well as documents and testimony from five former Trump aides including
political strategist Steve Bannon.
Nadler has not yet exercised that authority, with the timing of any such
move uncertain. The committee vote was 24-17 along party lines, with
Democrats in favor and Trump's fellow Republicans opposed.
Attorney General William Barr, a Trump appointee, issued a four-page
summary of Mueller's main conclusions last month including that the
special counsel did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with
Russia during the election.
Barr has pledged to release the nearly 400-page report by mid-April with
certain portions blacked out for reasons such as protecting secret grand
jury information and intelligence-gathering sources and methods.
In addition to Bannon, the committee authorized subpoenas for former
White House Counsel Donald McGahn, former Chief of Staff Reince Priebus,
former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks and former White
House deputy counsel Ann Donaldson.
They are among 81 people, agencies and entities the panel has sought
documents from as part of its obstruction and corruption investigation
into Trump and his associates.
Nadler's panel shifted its focus to subpoenas to obtain the Mueller
report when it became clear Barr would ignore a Democratic demand turn
it over unredacted by a Tuesday deadline. Democrats have expressed
concern Barr could use redactions to suppress evidence of potential
misconduct by Trump and his campaign.
Nadler said he would work with Barr "for a short period of time in the
hope that he will reveal to us the entire Mueller report and all the
underlying materials" and will go to court to get permission to obtain
the grand jury material.
"But if that doesn't work out in a very short order, we will issue the
subpoenas," Nadler added. "... The committee must see everything."
The potential battle between the executive and legislative branches over
the subpoenas could end up being resolved by the federal government's
third branch - the judiciary.
Representative Doug Collins, the committee's top Republican, said
Democrats are "desperate for dirt on this president."
"This is reckless. It's irresponsible. And it's disingenuous," Collins
said. "It's also confusing since the attorney general is doing exactly
what he said he would be doing: making as much of the report public as
possible under federal law and departmental policy."
It was not clear how likely the Justice Department would be to hand over
subpoenaed documents. It could ignore a subpoena, running the risk of
being held in contempt of Congress, and prepare for a potentially
lengthy court battle.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry
Nadler (D-NY) holds up volumes of evidence related to President Bill
Clinton's impeachment investigation as the committee debates before
voting to subpoena Special Counsel Robert Mueller's full, unredacted
report and underlying evidence from his investigation into alleged
Russian meddling in the 2016 election, on Capitol Hill in
Washington, U.S., April 3, 2019. REUTERS/Alex Wroblewski
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE ACTION
In another development, the Wall Street Journal reported that the
Democratic-led House Intelligence Committee, led by Trump critic
Adam Schiff, is seeking an interview with and documents from a top
organizer on Trump's inaugural committee.
Citing people familiar with the request, the Journal reported that
the effort signaled that Congress is expanding its probe of how the
inaugural committee raised and spent more than $100 million. The
report could not immediately be confirmed by Reuters.
Barr's March 24 letter to lawmakers explaining Mueller's "principal
conclusions" said the special counsel did not exonerate Trump on
obstruction of justice. Barr himself subsequently concluded that
Mueller's inquiry had not found sufficient evidence to warrant
criminal obstruction charges against Trump.
Trump has denied collusion with Russia and obstruction of justice.
Moscow denied election interference. Mueller and U.S. intelligence
agencies concluded Russia used a campaign of hacking and propaganda
to harm Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and boost Trump.
Democrats have pledged to fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme
Court to enforce a subpoena and obtain the full report.
"If the department still refuses, then it should be up to a judge -
not the president or his political appointee - to decide whether it
is appropriate for the committee to review the complete record,"
Nadler said.
Trump ally Lindsey Graham, Republican chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, wrote on Twitter that the House panel's demand
for classified information and grand jury testimony was "dangerous
and ridiculous."
The Justice Department declined comment. Priebus declined to
comment. A lawyer for Priebus, Bannon and McGahn, as well as a
Bannon spokeswoman, did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
Justice Department regulations give the attorney general wide
latitude on how much to release from special counsel inquiries.
Nadler told reporters he would also seek a judge's permission to get
access to Mueller's grand jury material, which is protected under
federal law. Nadler said Barr has not been willing to seek a court
order to release the data so far.
Republican Representative Jim Sensenbrenner said he would be willing
to join legal action to obtain the grand jury material and predicted
other Republicans would as well, noting that the House voted
overwhelmingly last month for the full report's release to Congress.
(Reporting by David Morgan; Additional reporting by Karen Freifeld,
Sarah N. Lynch, Steve Holland and Mark Hosenball; Editing by
Alistair Bell and Will Dunham)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |