| 
			
			 Researchers asked 4,681 people without diabetes, whose average age 
			was 43, to do leg and bench presses to measure their muscle 
			strength, and to perform treadmill tests to assess their 
			cardiorespiratory fitness. During an average follow-up period of 
			more than eight years, 229 participants, or almost 5 percent, 
			developed diabetes. 
 Compared to people who scored lowest on muscle strength tests at the 
			start of the study period, those with moderate muscle strength were 
			32 percent less likely to develop diabetes. Higher levels of muscle 
			strength, however, didn't appear to impact future diabetes risk.
 
 "You don't need to be the Hulk to help reduce your risk of 
			diabetes," said study co-author Dr. Angelique Brellenthin of Iowa 
			State University in Ames.
 
			
			 
			
 "Performing even a small amount of resistance training, which is a 
			main contributor to muscular strength, may provide big benefits," 
			Brellenthin said by email. "Bodyweight squats, lunges, push-ups and 
			planks are great for beginners."
 
 The study focused on type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the 
			disease, which is linked to obesity and aging and happens when the 
			body can't properly use or make enough of the hormone insulin to 
			convert blood sugar into energy.
 
 Moderate muscle strength was associated with a lower risk of 
			diabetes even after researchers accounted for a person's aerobic 
			fitness levels as well as risk factors that can contribute to 
			diabetes risk, such as family history, smoking, drinking, obesity 
			and high blood pressure, researchers report in Mayo Clinic 
			Proceedings.
 
 Before adjusting for these other factors, people with high muscle 
			strength did have a somewhat lower diabetes risk compared to the 
			weakest participants. But after accounting for these factors, that 
			advantage disappeared.
 
 "Muscles are highly metabolically active and high users of glucose," 
			or blood sugar, said Dr. Tahseen Chowdhury of Royal London Hospital 
			in the UK.
 
 "Greater muscle mass and volume will tend to use more glucose, but 
			also tend to be more sensitive to the effects of insulin which 
			increase muscle uptake of glucose," Chowdhury, who wasn't involved 
			in the study, said by email.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
             
			The study wasn't a controlled experiment designed to prove whether 
			or how muscle strength might directly impact the development of 
			diabetes. It also wasn't designed to determine which types of 
			workout might be best for diabetes prevention. 
			"The best way to prevent diabetes is to avoid a high-calorie diet 
			and to have regular aerobic physical activity at moderate to high 
			intensity for at least 30 minutes for 5 to 6 days a week," said Dr. 
			Stefano Volpato of the University of Ferrara in Italy.
 "Resistance training exercises are useful to increase muscle mass, 
			but results of this study are too preliminary to recommend this type 
			of intervention to prevent diabetes," Volpato, who wasn't involved 
			in the study, said by email.
 
 
			Because the risk of diabetes increases with age, it's possible that 
			results would look different for adults over 65, said Dr. Alan 
			Sinclair, director of the Foundation for Diabetes Research in Older 
			People at Diabetes Frail Ltd and a visiting chair in diabetes care 
			at Kings College London.
 "The study would have been more interesting and relevant if the mean 
			age of subjects was over 65 years where lowered muscle strength 
			means much more than diabetes risk – it also means something about 
			walking ability, risk of falls, risk of frailty, and loss of 
			independence," Sinclair, who wasn't involved in the study, said by 
			email.
 
			
			 
			Even so, "the study emphasizes the importance that maintaining a 
			moderate degree of muscle strength can provide some protective value 
			against diabetes developing," Sinclair said.
 SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2OOdWME Mayo Clinic Proceedings, online March 
			11, 2019.
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |