| 
			
			 Dr. Russell Portenoy, a professor at the Albert Einstein College of 
			Medicine, was an early advocate for the use of opioids for chronic 
			pain, a position he shared in medical journal articles, with 
			regulators, at physician conferences and in other forums. He also 
			was named as a defendant in some of the lawsuits filed by cities, 
			counties and states seeking to hold opioid makers - including Endo 
			and Mallinckrodt Plc - and their distributors liable for the cost of 
			the U.S. opioid epidemic. 
 But Portenoy began talking to plaintiffs' lawyers as early as 
			January 2018 and later struck a deal with the plaintiffs to serve as 
			a cooperating witness, the records show. In exchange for his 
			dismissal from the suits, Portenoy provided the plaintiffs with 
			documentation of opioid makers' payments to him over the years, as 
			well as a 36-page declaration that lays out what he would say on the 
			witness stand.
 
 Portenoy's previously confidential cooperation agreement and 
			declaration were made public Friday as a part of a discovery ruling 
			by David Cohen, a special master in the federal court in Cleveland, 
			Ohio, where hundreds of the opioid lawsuits have been consolidated. 
			In an email, Cohen said it was possible the records should have been 
			filed under seal out of public view.
 
			
			 
			Their disclosure offers a glimpse into the largely secretive 
			evidence gathering phase of the litigation. Purdue executives have 
			said the privately-held company is considering bankruptcy in the 
			face of its potential liability. The company avoided having to stand 
			as a defendant in a trial scheduled for May in Oklahoma by agreeing 
			to pay the state $270 million.
 Portenoy could not be reached for comment. His lawyer did not 
			immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
 
 Purdue spokesman Bob Josephson declined to comment on Portenoy's 
			declaration and new role in the litigation.
 
 Other companies, including Endo and Mallinckrodt, did not 
			immediately respond to requests for comment.
 
 Portenoy, who has held leadership positions at Memorial 
			Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Mount Sinai Beth Israel, was among 
			the first physicians to espouse opioids as an option for the 
			treatment of chronic pain, a condition that afflicts tens of 
			millions of Americans, in medical journal articles published in the 
			1980s and 1990s. Later, he shared his views with physicians at 
			conferences and in training videos sponsored by opioid makers, he 
			said in the declaration.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			 
			Previously, physicians had been trained to reserve opioids for 
			cancer and end-of-life pain. Opioids are chemically similar to 
			heroin and the risk of addiction was viewed as too great for their 
			widespread use.
 In his declaration, Portenoy said he never altered his positions 
			because of opioid makers' payments for research, speeches, 
			consulting and other work. But, he said, the companies paid only for 
			work that supported their interests and cited it selectively "to 
			promote opioids by referencing the positive statements that I made 
			repeatedly without providing the background, analysis of the 
			literature, and cautions that accompanied these positive 
			statements."
 
			These "unbalanced communications" encouraged the prescribing of 
			opioids to patients unsuited for them and by physicians who lacked 
			the skills to manage addiction, abuse and overdose, Portenoy said. 
			All of this, he concluded, "contributed to the rising incidence of 
			drug addiction and overdoses."
 Opioids are involved in about 50,000 deaths a year in the United 
			States. In an effort to staunch the toll, the U.S. Centers for 
			Disease Control and Prevention in 2016 recommended against opioids 
			as a first-line treatment for chronic pain.
 
 In a tentative decision issued on Friday, special master Cohen ruled 
			that Portenoy may serve as a witness for the plaintiffs - just not 
			in the first trial scheduled to take place in federal court in 
			Cleveland later this year. Cohen was responding to a complaint from 
			the defendant companies that they had inadequate notice of 
			Portenoy's new role.
 
			
			 
			Josephson said Purdue believed the special master's ruling was 
			appropriate. He did not elaborate.
 (Reporting by Lisa Girion in Los Angeles and Maria Caspani in New 
			York; Editing by Diane Craft and Daniel Wallis)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |